Image

In Her Memoir, Jill Biden Is a Watchful Spouse Who Didn’t Always Speak Up About Joe Biden

Jill Biden knew something was wrong before her husband ever took the debate stage.

In her memoir, “View from the East Wing,” released on Tuesday, the former first lady wrote that she did a “double take” when she saw President Joseph R. Biden Jr. just before the debate against Donald J. Trump in June 2024. She wrote that her husband of 47 years “looked like he was made of clay, strangely monochromatic.”

She said nothing, and on that night in Atlanta, she let her belief in her husband override her instincts.

“Oh God,” she wrote of watching Mr. Biden implode onstage minutes later, “will people watching assume this is how he is all the time?”

Well, yes: This was precisely what legions of Americans had assumed was happening behind closed doors. By the time the debate night arrived, polls had long shown that voters believed Mr. Biden was too old to hold his office. His public appearances were tightly controlled. He was physically declining, in part from a broken foot that had not healed correctly.

In her telling, by the time Dr. Biden got a glimpse of what others had long seen, it was too late. In any case, as she lays out in the book, she didn’t discuss her husband’s health with him, writing that “it’s always been the nature of our relationship that we’ve maintained a veil of discretion around personal health.”

This is a very curious policy, given that the Biden family lost its young north star, Beau Biden, to brain cancer in 2015, and that the family weathered multiple brain aneurysms that Mr. Biden had suffered decades earlier. This don’t-ask-don’t-tell practice, she wrote, is also a reason they avoided speaking about the addiction issues of their other son, Hunter Biden, until he wrote a memoir about them.

This practice also does not quite square with Dr. Biden’s input on other matters surrounding her husband’s health. When Mr. Biden was president, she wrote, she supported releasing the results of cognitive tests to quiet speculation about her husband’s mental faculties. She said she was overruled by other members of Mr. Biden’s inner circle.

If there were any additional belated doubts, she does not use her book to dwell on them.

“Had he grown too old for the job and I hadn’t noticed?” she wrote of another point, as Mr. Biden was contemplating ending his campaign. “I didn’t think so, but could I be objective enough to be sure?”

This is one of several questions Dr. Biden has raised in her book. Instead of offering direct answers, she maintains that raising important questions to her husband — or finding the answers herself — was simply not her place.

As she promotes her book, journalists have pushed her to fill in the blanks.

During an interview on the “Today” show on Monday, the anchor Craig Melvin asked her if she would have encouraged Mr. Biden to drop out if she could go back in time.

“As I look back, would I want to put Joe through the hurt and the pain that we felt during that time? Never,” she told him. “It was so hurtful.”

When they write memoirs, as first ladies have done for over a century, their stories generally reflect the nature of the White House they served, and protect the men they stood beside.

Nancy Reagan scorched the earth and hit back at critics with her pointedly titled memoir, “My Turn.” With “Living History,” Hillary Clinton wrote about her husband’s relationship with an intern while skimming over his record of indiscretions, leading critics to surmise that she was smoothing history to serve her own ambition. Michelle Obama wrote in “Becoming” that she was more disturbed by her husband’s critics than she had ever let on while he was in office. In Melania Trump’s self-titled book, her list of grievances reads like a dressed-up (and very long) Truth Social post. All were best sellers.

Dr. Biden’s book reflects an insular White House where loyalty was prized and Mr. Biden’s feelings were prioritized. In her book and in interviews, she has emphasized the pain that has been inflicted on her family. She has leaned on themes of resilience and pain to justify some of Mr. Biden’s most controversial decisions, including his choice to pardon Hunter Biden, but also his decision, at age 80, to run again at all.

She wrote that Mr. Biden had considered being a single-term president during the 2020 race, but “as he explored the question of a re-election bid, every one of his senior advisers insisted he needed to run.” She was conflicted, and worried about Republican attacks on her family. But she supported another campaign.

“For the good of the country, I knew that I, for one, would rather Joe have a second term than not,” she wrote. In an interview on “Morning Joe” on Tuesday, she reiterated her belief that Mr. Biden would have beaten Mr. Trump had he stayed in the race.

In other cases, she removed herself from the room where consequential things happened. In one scene from “View from the East Wing” — like many lines in the book, the title is a passive hint at a spicy thought that remains unsaid — Dr. Biden listened as Mr. Biden was on the phone telling Kamala Harris, his vice president, that he would drop out of the race and endorse her. “Could you do it soon? Say, in 20 minutes?” Ms. Harris asked, in Dr. Biden’s account. The first lady left the room.

Americans know how things ended. Mr. Trump stormed back to office and is busy turning the Justice Department on his foes, threatening to attack American allies, and running roughshod over the White House complex with his design projects.

So some people — especially Democrats — seem annoyed that the former first lady has written a new memoir about how she felt when her husband melted down on a 2024 debate stage: “Is he short-circuiting? Is this a stroke?” (As part of her media blitz around the book, Dr. Biden told NPR that Mr. Biden’s doctors “checked him out” in the moments after the debate and determined that he was fine.)

Meghan Hays, a former Biden White House official, is among those who think now is not the time to remind the party of such a painful moment: “I think Democrats want to move on to 2026 and 2028 and not look backwards,” she said. “This retelling of history is not helpful to that effort.”

Other Democrats have taken a longer view. Senator Chris Coons of Delaware, a Biden ally, said that the former first lady “deserves to be more than a sound bite” as the public digests her recollections about the debate.

“I hope people will open their aperture and take a few minutes and reflect on how much Joe Biden got done and how much Jill Biden brought to their administration,” Mr. Coons said. “There was much less daily cruelty and corruption.”

Indeed, much of “View from the East Wing” focuses on the work that Biden officials did to pull the country out of a pandemic. She wrote of her efforts to convince Democratic senators to support her initiative to make community college free for Americans.

In negotiations over a massive social spending package, the provision for that effort was traded away in an ultimately aborted effort to help fund early education programs: “I didn’t want to compete against pre-K,” she wrote.

There are moments in the book where the darkening political climate colors her more anodyne duties as first lady. Dr. Biden relished decorating the White House for the holidays each year, but in 2024, she was worried about being too celebratory and inciting a riot. Literally.

“I wanted to keep it simple because of the widespread fear that if the election was called for the Democrats, the result might be a civil war,” she wrote.

There is another reason people buy these memoirs: They want to understand how a marriage functions under so much stress and scrutiny. In “View from the East Wing,” Dr. Biden suggests that there are lines that not even a political spouse of 47 years can cross. She wrote that she was shocked to learn that Mr. Biden was diagnosed with late-stage prostate cancer that had spread to his bones.

“You put the president in bubble wrap, and he ends up with stage IV prostate cancer?” she wrote, imagining a question posed by the news media. “It made no sense.”

By way of explanation, she has painted a portrait of an old-school marriage. In the year before Mr. Biden left office, Dr. Biden noticed that he was using the bathroom multiple times a night. She gave word to one of Mr. Biden’s (male) doctors, and appeared to leave it at that.

In an interview with The Wall Street Journal published on Monday, she said that this policy was “generational” — “it was just the way we grew up.”

It is a practice at odds with the modern legacy Dr. Biden wants to leave for herself, as the first person in her role to hold a paying job outside of the White House. She wants to be remembered as a fierce advocate of cancer research and a woman who tried her best to balance several competing roles at once.

“I wanted to say to American women, ‘Look at me, I am like you are,’” she said on the “Today” show.

Dr. Biden entered public life when she was 26 years old, as the bride of a Delaware senator who had already suffered the unimaginable loss of his first wife and infant daughter. Now 74, America’s most experienced living political spouse has closed a remarkable and turbulent chapter of her life by telling the reader what she saw, just not necessarily how she felt.

The scene in the book that says the most about her unfolds on the day of Mr. Trump’s second inauguration. She woke up and looked at the frosted-over windows of the White House residence. She used her finger to scrawl a message on the frosty glass.

Dr. Biden never reveals what she wrote. She let the message evaporate, leaving her readers to wonder what else she did not share.

SHARE THIS POST