Welcome to a different installment of our BDC Market Weekly Assessment, the place we focus on market exercise within the Enterprise Growth Firm (“BDC”) sector from each the bottom-up – highlighting particular person information and occasions – in addition to the top-down – offering an outline of the broader market.
We additionally attempt to add some historic context in addition to related themes that look to be driving the market or that buyers should be conscious of. This replace covers the interval by means of the third week of November.
Market Motion
BDCs had one other good week with a complete return of round 1%. It was the best-performing sector throughout the revenue area we observe. A continued rally in shares and good Q3 outcomes are supporting BDCs.
12 months-to-date, BDCs are the second-best performing sector after MLPs.
BDCs have nearly totally recovered from the valuation drop off their latest peak. The typical valuation in our protection has moved up above 100%, roughly in keeping with the historic common.
Market Themes
As BDC buyers know, BDCs should not all the identical. One of many key dimensions wherein they differ is the a part of the market they concentrate on. Bigger BDCs corresponding to BXSL, OBDC, ARCC, OCSL and others concentrate on the so-called higher middle-market, or firms with EBITDA above roughly $50-100mm, whereas different BDCs corresponding to CSWC, FDUS, PNNT and others concentrate on smaller firms with EBITDA within the $10-50m vary.
A lot of this dynamic is solely as a result of dimension of the BDCs – bigger BDCs concentrate on bigger firms and smaller BDCs concentrate on smaller firms. It is because smaller debtors search for small loans and bigger debtors search for bigger loans. It would not make a lot sense for a bigger BDC to concentrate on decrease middle-market firms and vice-versa. A tiny mortgage for a big BDC requires a lot the identical due diligence as a bigger mortgage however in all probability would not transfer the needle when it comes to portfolio allocation. On the similar time a smaller BDC is unlikely to have the ability to stump up the capital to supply a large enough mortgage to a bigger borrower.
What’s fascinating, nonetheless, is that some BDCs additionally attempt to defend their space of the middle-market area. For instance, BXSL (a big BDC specializing in the higher middle-market area) has this chart of their newest quarterly presentation which reveals that bigger firms have a roughly comparable unfold on loans per flip of web leverage however a a lot decrease default charge and a better degree of earnings development.
PNNT, then again, reveals that loans to smaller firms have a a lot greater yield on loans (1-1.5% greater on first-lien loans and extra on second-lien loans) and decrease danger within the type of decrease leverage and higher covenants.
These sound like very totally different messages, so what is going on on? One reply is that the definitions don’t fairly line up. PNNT makes use of $50m+ because the higher middle-market whereas BXSL makes use of $100m+.
Two, PNNT makes use of information from the Nationwide Heart For the Center Market and Refinitiv whereas BXSL makes use of the Lincoln Worldwide Non-public Market Database.
Three, the metrics do not line up. PNNT is concentrated on yield, leverage and covenants for first-lien and second-lien individually whereas BXSL is concentrated on unfold per flip of leverage and default charge for the 2 forms of loans collectively.
All in all, the BDCs are clearly going to cherry decide the numbers that go well with them. A smaller BDC isn’t going to be an higher middle-market lender and vice-versa even when the numbers supported that funding case. Other than the pure mechanics of lending, each components of the middle-market enable for robust returns. As an example, decrease and core-middle market lenders like FDUS and CSWC have put up very robust efficiency numbers as have a lot of their higher middle-market counterparts. We are able to additionally discover lenders in each areas that haven’t carried out nicely.
In the end, BDCs can do nicely in each components of the market so buyers should not essentially concentrate on one space simply due to what they see in a BDC presentation. It would make sense, nonetheless, to contemplate diversifying a BDC portfolio alongside this dimension simply as buyers diversify their BDC publicity throughout different dimensions corresponding to portfolio allocation (e.g. first-lien vs. second-lien / fairness and so forth.) and trade sectors.
Market Commentary
Blackstone Secured Lending (BXSL) reported good outcomes for a complete NAV return of 4% through the quarter or roughly in the midst of the pack to date this quarter. The NAV rose near 1% because of a excessive degree of retained revenue. Web revenue did fall, nonetheless that was largely because of a large share issuance that hasn’t but been put to work. Non-accruals remained near zero. BXSL is buying and selling at a valuation of 108% which is 6% above the median BDC and is on the costly facet traditionally.
The Golub BDC (GBDC) had a great Q3. Web revenue rose 13% – because of a mixture of upper base charges in addition to the corporate’s administration charge discount to 1%.
A base dividend of $0.37 was declared – a 12% improve. The corporate additionally declared a $0.07 supplemental. We received’t see equally giant dividends and web revenue will increase going ahead because the administration charge lower is non-repeatable. GBDC has now moved to commerce on par with the sector valuation which is fairly uncommon within the final couple of years and is not a slam dunk allocation because it was again then.
Total, BDCs proceed to ship robust earnings. If danger urge for food holds up nicely, we should always see a bumper This fall as deal seasonality kicks in and results in a bump in prepayment charge revenue throughout the sector. BDCs corresponding to ARCC and TSLX (pictured beneath) could possibly be large beneficiaries of this dynamic.