DEEP DIVE: Dishonorable Choose Beryl Howell EXPOSED IN DETAIL! Why the January sixth Choose That Presided Over Rudy Giuliani’s Trial MUST BE IMPEACHED “Trump-Hating Judge Shredded The Constitution” | The Gateway Pundit

Choose Beryl Howell had the time of her life presiding over the trial of Rudy Giuliani.

Sitting perched above Courtroom Quantity 26 of the E. Barrett Prettyman Courthouse in Washington D.C., the Trump-hating Obama appointee regarded on final week as an unhinged, bias and corrupted jury ordered Giuliani pay $148 million {dollars} to former Georgia election employees Ruby Freeman and Shane Moss.

If this ridiculous judgement is just not the ultimate proof wanted for lawmakers to know {that a} D.C. jury is past rehabilitation and a D.C. choose is NOT match to fairly choose Conservatives or Trump supporters, I have no idea what’s.

(*Please learn our deep dive into the unethical and unconstitutional actions of Beryl Howell concerning January sixth defendants by scrolling down on this article. SHE MUST BE IMPEACHED.)

Earlier final week, the Dishonorable Choose Howell giggled with adoration in her eyes for Ruby Freeman as the previous Georgia election employee took the stand and proclaimed she wished to supply Howell one of many particular “ginger-mint candies” she delivered to court docket.

It was nauseating to witness.

Howell additionally lavished in scolding Mr. Giuliani and his lawyer Joseph Sibley after Giuliani spoke to reporters exterior the courtroom. The plaintiff’s aspect of the courtroom was full of what regarded like a workforce of maybe fifteen legal professionals and personnel, in stark distinction to Defendant Giuliani’s aspect.

PLEASE HELP AMERICA’S MAYOR RUDY GIULIANI’S APPEAL HERE!

The person that many know as “America’s Mayor” and one of many prime prosecutors in American historical past sat on the opposite aspect of the courtroom along with his sole lawyer Joseph Sibley. Giuliani watched on because the Judicial system that he as soon as so honorably served was weaponized towards him within the type of the Dishonorable Choose Howell and a tarnished jury that was accepted by the Courtroom- regardless of their apparent bias. Giuliani has been crippled in authorized bills since January of 2020. In addition to utilizing the Division of Justice to raze their political opponents, it has now develop into apparent that the civil court docket system (overseen by the identical partisan judges because the felony court docket) can also be a helpful weapon the left is using to destroy and bankrupt Trump and his associates.

PLEASE HELP AMERICA’S MAYOR RUDY GIULIANI’S APPEAL HERE!

Choose Beryl Howell is an unfit choose that has stretched the legislation to accommodate a political agenda. This in-depth article will checklist information as to why Choose Beryl Howell should be investigated by the Congress, and why her hand in desecrating the Constitutional Due Course of rights of January sixth defendants justifies calls by activist teams for her impeachment.

As reported by Christina Leila of The Gateway Pundit, Jack Smith and Obama-appointed Choose Beryl Howell are now attempting to cover up the fact that they both suggested Trump was a ‘flight risk’ to justify the nondisclosure order on X/Twitter. Smith had requested Howell for a secret search warrant for Trump’s X/Twitter account @RealDonaldTrump.

Jim Hoft additionally reported that the novel and lawless Choose Howell is overseeing a case towards Trump in Washington D.C. and the way the judge went on an unhinged toxic Trump-hating rant in a public speech.

How is that this moral, and even authorized?

Moreover, Elise Stefanik (R-NY) simply filed an ethics compliant charging Howell with election interference primarily based on a speech Howell gave final month on the Women’s White Collar Defense Association awards dinner. Learn extra HERE.

See Stefanik’s full assertion on X:

I filed a Criticism of Judicial Misconduct towards Choose Beryl Howell, as a result of election interference by judges destroys public confidence within the federal judiciary, tears aside the material of our Republic, and is prohibited. It should finish now.

DC Obama Choose Beryl Howell gave a… pic.twitter.com/LBBDmK5CXb

— Elise Stefanik (@EliseStefanik) December 15, 2023

Please contact Rep. Elise Stefanik HERE and encourage her to continue to push for an investigation of Howell.

Earlier this 12 months, the Dishonorable Choose Howell discovered Giuliani responsible for defamation of the 2 election employees when he reported on their conduct on election evening as they counted ballots. This resolution was not primarily based on the precise deserves of the election employee’s case, however quite as a result of Giuliani didn’t flip in discovery quick sufficient to the choose’s liking. He was present in “Default Judgment” and due to this fact responsible for defamation of the characters of Freeman and Moss.

In response to sources, the invention info the choose requested was not accessible to Giuliani on the time, partially resulting from the truth that his electronics and private information had been confiscated by the FBI and Feds.

“This court does not appear to have any qualms about what implications this case has on free speech in America,” mentioned John Tabacco of Newsmax. “Opinions and observing and reporting what we see is a necessary first Amendment Protection in a democracy. The effect of this will be that news commentators and analysts will be afraid to share their opinion and what they observe to their audiences.”

DEEP DIVE INTO THE UNETHICAL AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTIONS OF BERYL HOWELL REGARDING JANUARY sixth DEFENDANTS AND PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP.

(*This can be a detailed deep dive with the intent of creating positive this info is on the report and accessible for readers which can be , and in addition for the advantage of a number of Congressmen and Congresswomen that learn The Gateway Pundit.)

That is the Oath of Workplace for Federal Judges that Beryl Howell has broke a number of occasions:

“I, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as [a United States District Judge or United States Magistrate Judge] under the Constitution(link is external) and laws of the United States. So help me God.”

Here are the Codes of Conduct for United States Judges. Please take the time to learn by way of them and see for your self how Choose Beryl Howell has fragrantly damaged the codes and should be faraway from energy. The codes particularly states Canon 5: A Choose Ought to Chorus from Political Exercise. This text and others published on The Gateway Pundit present that Howell has not kept away from political exercise or speech- in truth she has acted as a political activist from the bench for the left and the get together that put her in energy.

CRIES FOR THE IMPEACHMENT OF JUDGE BERYL HOWELL BY SOCIAL JUSTICE ADVOCACY GROUPS

In response to social justice advocacy group Condemned USA, Beryl Howell, then serving as Chief Choose of the District Courtroom, violated a number of Canons by deciding circumstances with bias, prejudice, and discriminatory remedy primarily based on partisan politics.

Articles of Impeachment were drawn up by the advocacy group “Condemned USA” and introduced to Congress.

In response to the Condemned USA web site and drafted Articles of Impeachment:

“After over a 12 months of statement, analysis, and dealing intently with sitting Congressional Employees, Condemned USA has constructed articles of impeachment to be introduced towards radicalized DC Choose, Beryl Howell for misusing her place of energy to impose her personal perverted justice towards the folks of the USA of America.

Wherefore, Beryl Howell by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removing from workplace and
disqualification to carry and revel in any workplace of honor, belief, or revenue beneath the USA.”

READ THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT BY CONDEMNED USA HERE.

Here’s a bullet-point abstract of the Howell’s unethical and unlawful violations that we are going to talk about intimately on this article:

1. Choose Beryl Howell has gone out of her solution to tarnish and affect the D.C. jury pool, as can be confirmed beneath. The choose is know for making nasty prejudicial statements throughout her time as Chief Choose of the USA District Courtroom for the District of Columbia (March 16, 2016 – March 16, 2023). These statements pertained to President Trump and January sixth defendants, successfully tarnished the D.C. Jury pool past restore. If anybody needs to be sued for defamation, it’s Choose Beryl Howell by the January6 sixth defendants. Her phrases have made it not possible for them to get a good trial- inflicting irreparable injury to their life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.
2. Most egregiously and comparatively unknown to the general public, this choose single-handedly and UNCONSTITUTIONALLY modified bail reform legal guidelines to maintain January sixth defendants in jail PRE-TRIAL DETENTION- creating a brand new set of qualifying “factors” that pertain to the pre-trial detention of January sixth defendants AND NO OTHER CRIMINAL DEFENDANT.  This can be a clear violation of the “Equal Protection” Clause of the USA Structure, and the Supreme Courtroom should right this abhorrent violation of Due Course of created by a sitting Choose when she was Chief Choose of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
3. Choose Howell publicly campaigned for the prosecutors of the U.S. Division of Justice to ramp up prosecutions of January sixth Defendants.
4. Howell overturned the choices of a minimum of 14 Justice of the Peace judges so as to maintain January sixth Defendants in uncontitutional pre-trial detention in a staggering show of authoritarianism and the undermining of her fellow judges. How can over 14 judges from jurisdictions throughout the nation all be flawed?
5. Howell  blocked January sixth protection attorneys from ensuring authorized defenses on behalf of their purchasers and in accordance with authorized consultants, she has outright inspired prosecutors to cost defendants extra harshly.
6. Choose Howell violated Constitutional Due Course of by destroying the important attorney-client privilege.
7. As Chief Choose, Choose Howell resisted granting change of venue to January sixth Defendants, President Trump and Rudy Giuliani, regardless of overwhelming proof she is aware of that establishes a good path beneath a D.C. jury is not possible for the Defendants.
8. Choose Howell violated a number of Canons by not recusing herself after admitting she was personally affected by occasions of January 6, 2021.
9. Choose Howell violated Due Course of by destroying the important attorney-client privilege in a case involving President Donald Trump.

Please contact Rep. Jim Jordan of the Judiciary Committee HERE and encourage him to continue to push for an investigation of Howell. (Please share the knowledge with him and hyperlink to article).

1) JUDGE HOWELL HAS DEFAMED AND INCRIMINATED JANUARY 6TH DEFENDANTS BEFORE THEIR TRIALS.

Choose Howell’s phrases have executed an awesome disservice to the due course of proper’s of January sixth defendants. She has used her platform as Chief Choose of the D.C. Federal Courtroom to defame and slandered their names and reputations of all January sixth defendants BEFORE their trails.

“A mere 22 days after January 6, 2021, before any cases had gone to trial, Howell pre-judged the events and guilt or innocence of individual Defendants in violation of the Canons and Due Process,” mentioned Treniss Evans of Condemned USA.

Listed below are some examples of her statements, all of which break her oath to the Structure and and the Code of Conduct for D.C. Judges.

“This was not a peaceful protest. Hundreds of people came to Washington, DC, to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power,” Howell mentioned effectively earlier than most January sixth defendants had been discovered responsible and any proof was produced.

“The rioters attacking the Capitol on Jan. 6 were not mere trespassers engaging in protected First Amendment conduct or protests. They were not merely disorderly, as countless videos show the mob that attacked the Capitol was violent. Everyone participating in the mob contributed to that violence.”

“This was no mere trespass.”

“The damage to the reputation of our democracy, which is usually held up around the world … that reputation suffered because of Jan. 6.”

“The rioters attacking the Capitol on Jan. 6 were not mere trespassers engaging in protected First Amendment conduct or protests. They were not merely disorderly, as countless videos show the mob that attacked the Capitol was violent. Everyone participating in the mob contributed to that violence.”

These early statements made by Howell tarnished the jury pool, influenced the opposite judges beneath her, and enabled/empowered the prosecutors to overcharge defendants and overstep the traditional boundaries of the court docket.

Please contact Rep. Elise Stefanik HERE and encourage her to continue to push for an investigation of Howell. (Please share the knowledge together with her and hyperlink to article).

2) “THE CRESTMAN 6 FACTORS”- THE DISHONORABLE HOWELL’S BIGGEST SCAR IS HER RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL  PRETRIAL DETENTION OF SCORES OF JANUARY 6TH DEFENDANTS.

The “Chrestman 6” components are a set of recent guidelines that Choose Beryl Howell single-handedly created to maintain January sixth defendants in jail pre-trial. She illegally created new legal guidelines to bypass an actual legislation handed by Congress and signed into legislation by President Ronald Reagan in 1984. That legislation is the notable Bail Reform Act of 1984. The identify “Crestman” comes from January sixth Defendant William Chrestman, a Proud Boy that peacefully entered the Capitol on January sixth and dedicated no act of violence. The “Chrestman Six” components had been first utilized by Howell at his bail listening to and have become the norm thereafter for different judges maintain January sixth defendant behind bars, successfully treating them as “non-citizens” and locations in a particular class that receives much less due course of rights than different American Residents.

In response to Articles of Impeachment ready by a J6 defendant’s rights advocacy group Condemned USA:

“Judge Howell violated multiple Canons, the Bail Reform Act, and the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 and also exceeded the authority of her office by concocting an entirely new set of rules applicable only to January 6 prosecutions, bail hearings, and sentencing proceedings, starting with her decisions in the “Chrestman 6” case.”

In layman’s phrases, Howell actually defied the Bail Reform Act that applies to ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS and created a complete new algorithm that ONLY APPLY TO JANUARY sixth DEFENDANTS! That is an abhorrent violation of the Due Course of and Equal Safety clauses of the Structure. It’s the job of Congress to make legal guidelines, and so they did with the Bail Reform Act of 1984 – which clearly states that bail shall be granted to any defendant that’s 1) not prone to flee or 2) pose a hazard to a different particular person or property.

As a result of virtually 100% of January sixth defendants meet these {qualifications} and had been granted bail by Justice of the Peace judges, Howell created a whole new set of things that might maintain a January sixth defendant in jail pre-trial. These new guidelines have been dubbed the “Crestman 6” components, and have saved a whole lot of January sixth defendants in pre-trial detention that they in any other case wouldn’t qualify for beneath the Bail Reform Act of 1984.

Particularly, the Bail Reform Act of 1984 permits the federal courts to base pretrial launch choices on (1) the chance of pretrial flight the defendant poses, and (2) the potential menace the defendant poses to the neighborhood or to particular people together with the chance that the defendant would commit new crimes whereas on launch.

“The DC District Court set aside all relevant court precedent to conjure up new rules that would adversely affect all January 6th Defendants—and President Donald J. Trump,” mentioned prime January sixth protection lawyer Joseph McBride. “The illegal detention and subsequent mistreatment of January 6th Defendants is a stellar example of this fact.”

McBride continued: “The Bail Reform Act of 1984 is the legislation of the land when deciding whether or not an accused particular person will go house or be remanded throughout the pendency of their trial.  Below it, folks can solely be remanded if they’re harmful or a flight danger. The essence of the Act is easy: flight dangers should be remanded to make sure their look in court docket, whereas harmful individuals should be remanded to make sure the neighborhood’s security. The edge for dangerousness is excessive: assume El Chapo, not MAGA Grandma.

As such, any honest software of the Bail Reform Act would have resulted in 99% of all January sixth Defendants being launched on their recognizance after arrest.  Because of this the primary cohort of January Sixers, whose bail hearings had been heard of their house jurisdictions, had been launched on their very own recognizance.  Merely put, they had been neither a flight danger nor harmful beneath the that means of the Act.

Washington, nonetheless, wished to ship a message, which is why, in every case, it appealed the native Justice of the Peace’s resolution and eliminated the listening to to DC, the place 100% of the choices to launch had been overturned. Harmless males had been thrown into the Gulag.

Query: How might this occur if the native and DC federal choose had been making use of the identical legislation? Reply: DC Judges distributed with the Bail Reform Act and made their very own ‘law’. Beryl Howell, as an example, made up the Chrestman evaluation as a result of the Bail Reform Act was insufficiently punitive.That is how Howell single-handedly locked up dozens of harmless males. She incarcerated them not for being a flight danger or harmful—however as a result of they dared to help President Donald J. Trump.”

Beneath is a listing of the brand new “rules” that Howell conjured as much as solely have an effect on January sixth defendants. The concerns that may maintain a J6 Defendant in pre-trial detention embrace whether or not a defendant:

1. has been charged with felony or misdemeanor offenses
2. engaged in prior planning earlier than arriving on the Capitol
3. carried or used a harmful weapon throughout the riot
4. coordinated with different contributors earlier than, throughout, or after the riot
5. assumed both a proper or a de facto management function within the assault by encouraging different rioters’
   misconduct
6. the character of “the defendant’s words and movements during the riot,” together with whether or not he “damaged
   federal property,” “threatened or confronted federal officials or law enforcement, or otherwise promoted or celebrated
   efforts to disrupt the certification of the electoral vote count during the riot.”

For each single different defendant in the USA of America, the one two components that may maintain somebody in pretrial detention are:

1. they’re a flight danger.
2. they pose a severe hazard menace to the neighborhood (and this should be confirmed, which is usually very tough).

Due to the Dishonorable Choose Howell, there at the moment are two units of guidelines in America- one set for January sixth Defendants and Trump Supporters, and one other set for everybody else.

“How is this happening in America?” requested Tina Ryan of Residents In opposition to Political Persecution. “Why hasn’t this been taken to the Supreme Court? Will the GOP House actually do their job in 2024 and start investigating? As of right now they have DONE NOTHING TO INVESTIGATE THE DUE PROCES VIOLATIONS OF JANUARY 6TH DEFENDANTS and the overreach of these partisan judges.This Trump-hating Judge Howell has shredded the Constitution. They need to subpoena her immediately.”

Please contact Rep. Jim Jordan of the Judiciary Committee HERE and encourage him to continue to push for an investigation of Howell. (Please share the knowledge with him and hyperlink to article).

3) JUDGE HOWELL OVER-TURNED AT LEAST FOURTEEN MAGISTRATE JUDGES OUTSIDE OF WASHINGTON D.C. IN A STAGGERING DISPLAY OF OVERREACH AND AUTHORITARIAN POWER NOT TYPICALLY WIELDED BY A JUDGE.

In response to Articles of Impeachment drawn up for Congress’ use by advocacy group Condemned USA:

“Beryl Howell, then serving as Chief Choose of the District Courtroom, violated a number of Canons by deciding circumstances with bias, prejudice, and discriminatory remedy primarily based on partisan politics. Particularly, Howell over-ruled a minimum of fourteen. Justice of the Peace Judges (recognized to date) from across the nation who made choices to launch Defendants in prosecutions associated to occasions on January 6, 2021, from detention whereas awaiting trial.

Pre-conviction bail is to not be punishment nor a method of ethical condemnation. Federal Judges can’t maintain charged individuals incarcerated out of dislike or disapproval. Bail is restricted to making sure {that a} Defendant will seem for trial and whereas awaiting trial won’t be a hazard to himself or the neighborhood. Congress requires Judges to contemplate any preparations or circumstances that may be devised to reduce dangers and deny bail provided that no cheap situation can obtain the necessities for launch on bail.

But Chief Choose Howell over-turned a minimum of fourteen Justice of the Peace Judges from completely different components of the nation who had determined that particular person Defendants needs to be launched on bail pending trial, notably beneath the presumption of innocence forward of trial. Different Magistrates have additionally defined to Defendants that they might have launched them on bail, however they thought of it futile to take action as a result of Chief Choose Howell would merely over-rule them and order detention with out bail. One Defendant supplied to encompass his home, the place he could be in house detention, with surveillance cameras managed by Pre-Trial Providers or the like and be disadvantaged of use of telephone or laptop besides along with his lawyer getting ready for trial. He was denied.

Over-turning fourteen Magistrates exterior of Washington, D.C. reveals Howell’s bias and prejudgment steeped within the society and politics of D.C., and vindictiveness towards these disliked.”

Please contact Rep. Jim Jordan of the Judiciary Committee HERE and encourage him to continue to push for an investigation of Howell. (Please share the knowledge with him and hyperlink to article).

4) JUDGE HOWELL PUBLICLY CAMPAIGNED FOR THE PROSECUTORS OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE TO RAMP UP PROSECUTIONS OF JANUARY 6TH DEFENDANTS.

In Article 2 of Condemned USA’s Impeachment papers:

“Choose Howell violated a number of Canons and the Constitutional structure of the Federal Authorities’s three Branches of Authorities by publicly campaigning for the prosecutors of the united statesDepartment of Justice to vary their strategy in indictments of and dealing with of prosecutions associated to January 6, 2021.

Howell repeatedly and really publicly tried to vary public perceptions of January 6, 2021, and to direct and dictate the prosecution choices of the U.S. Division of Justice. Howell each in search of to outline the phrases of prosecutions introduced earlier than the Judiciary and in addition presiding over the ensuing felony court docket circumstances has violated her function as a Federal choose as a impartial arbiter required by Due Course of.

Howell abused her authority by in search of to govern public notion and – whereas pretending to be simply suggesting regardless of the heavy, weighty hand of a Federal choose – directing prosecutors from a distinct Department of the U.S. Authorities to change their charging choices and sentencing suggestions to her liking. Howell abused her workplace not merely to determine circumstances over which she presided in keeping with Due Course of however to aim to vary how January 6, 2021, was seen politically and publicly far past the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Courthouse. Howell’s concern that “there continues to be a theme that what happened on Jan. 6 was a protest gone wrong by some people.” is a violation and abuse of her judicial function. It’s not a Choose’s function to handle public relations, nor remedy a “theme” in public dialogue, notably when the U.S. Home of Representatives’ Choose Committee to Examine the Assault on the U.S. Capitol was already busily spinning the subject with many hearings on nationwide tv. Howell didn’t have the authority nor was there any want for a Federal choose to inform the general public and elected officers what to assume past her courtroom, notably months or years earlier than any dependable proof was admitted into an precise trial.

Moreover, Howell’s concern that “there continues to be a theme that what happened on Jan. 6 was a protest gone wrong by some people” relies upon upon the unconstitutional idea that everybody within the neighborhood shares collectivist guilt. Solely by Howell judging Defendants as a collective, not individually, might Howell declare a “theme.” And no proof had but been introduced in any trial. Howell voiced a purely political opinion primarily based on pre-judgment. Howell chastised the DOJ for not charging all Defendants extra severely, uniformly, whereas long-term, veteran prosecutor James Pearce, with many years of expertise with politically charged circumstances, tried to elucidate to Howell that “the Government pursues charges it can prove beyond a reasonable doubt.” What if some Defendants clearly engaged in severe misconduct, whereas there isn’t proof concerning others? Howell demanded that the DoJ cost everybody far more severely throughout the board, whatever the proof, high quality of proof, and circumstances in every particular person case.”

Please contact Rep. Elise Stefanik HERE and encourage her to continue to push for an investigation of Howell. (Please share the knowledge together with her and hyperlink to article).

6) HOWELL HAS DEPRIVED DEFENDANTS OF THEIR DUE PROCESS RIGHTS TO PUT ON A DEFENSE AND CALL WITNESSES IN THEIR DEFENSE.

In response to Condemned USA’s Articles of Impeachment:

“Howell also set a precedent that the rest of the District Court followed erroneously and illogically claiming that no official such as even then President Donald Trump can transform what is unlawful into what is lawful.”

Howell has prevented January sixth Defendants from making this protection, which might additionally suggest that the defendants can’t use the protection that the Capitol Police allowed them in- due to this fact making their conduct lawful.

“Howell has deprived Defendants of their Due Process rights to put on a defense and call witnesses in their defense with a plainly irrational argument,” says authorized skilled Treniss Evans of Condemned USA.

Choose Howell violated Constitutional Due Course of by destroying the important attorney-client privilege. As however one instance of many such situations by the Chief Choose and different District Judges of late, Howell shocked the authorized and political world on March 2023, by ordering Donald Trump’s lawyer Evan Corcoran to testify towards Corcoran’s consumer Trump earlier than a Grand Jury regarding Jack Smith’s investigation into categorized paperwork allegedly locked in storage at Mar-a-Lago.

PLEASE HELP AMERICA’S MAYOR RUDY GIULIANI’S APPEAL HERE!

7) JUDGE HOWELL RESISTED GRANTING CHANGE OF VENUE TO JANUARY 6TH DEFENDANTS, DESPITE OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE THAT THE JURY POOL IS BIASED.

As Chief Choose, Choose Howell resisted granting change of venue to January sixth Defendants, President Trump and Rudy Giuliani, regardless of overwhelming proof she is aware of that establishes a good path beneath a D.C. jury is not possible for the Defendants.

In response to Condemned USA:

“Howell has resisted change of venue of cases after the public is widely convinced that the Federal courts of D.C. are biased and cannot (will not) give Defendants like those from January 6, 2021, events a fair trial. When there is no valid reason, despite a little inconvenience in service of Due Process and public confidence in the Judiciary, the intense resistance to a change of venue becomes perceived proof in the public’s eye that the District Court is in fact biased. The more insistently Judges desperately cling to cases despite questions about perceived bias and partiality, the more strongly bias appears.”

PLEASE HELP AMERICA’S MAYOR RUDY GIULIANI’S APPEAL HERE!

8) JUDGE HOWELL VIOLATED MULTIPLE CANONS BY NOT RECUSING HERSELF AFTER ADMITTING SHE WAS PERSONALLY AFFECTED BY EVENTS OF JANUARY 6TH.

In response to Condemned USA:

“Choose Howell violated a number of Canons by judging on the premise of private data having been personally affected by occasions of January 6, 2021.

‘Whereas particularly referring to seeing Nationwide Guardsmen on the Capitol after the very fact from the window of her Chambers workplace, because of this she might see additionally your entire occasions on the Capitol from her courthouse workplace window on January 6, 2021. If she might see the Nationwide Guard on Capitol Hill the day after, she might see your entire occasions all of January 6, 2021, together with upon returning to her chambers from the courtroom for any lunch or break or on the finish of the day. (If the courthouse had been closed, this begs the query what induced its closure determined earlier than that day? And if it had been closed, then  Howell was personally and instantly affected by occasions of January sixth. Howell is due to this fact ineligible to sit down as a choose on circumstances for which she is a witness, even when not known as to testify.”

Please contact Rep. Jim Jordan of the Judiciary Committee HERE and encourage him to continue to push for an investigation of Howell. (Please share the knowledge with him and hyperlink to article).

9) JUDGE HOWELL VIOLATED DUE PROCESS BY DESTROYING THE ESSENTIAL ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE IN A CASE INVOLVING PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP.

In response to Articles of Impeachment drafted by Condemned USA for Congress:

“Choose Howell violated Constitutional Due Course of by destroying the important attorney-client privilege. As however one instance of many such situations by the Chief Choose and different District Judges of late, Howell shocked the authorized and political world on March 17, 2023, by ordering Donald Trump’s lawyer Evan Corcoran to testify towards Corcoran’s consumer Trump earlier than a Grand Jury regarding Jack Smith’s investigation into categorized paperwork allegedly locked in storage at Mar-a-Lago. Calling Trump’s lawyer earlier than the Grand Jury is the worst doable intrusion as a result of solely the prosecution speaks to or supplies proof to the Grand Jury and targets are usually not current and don’t have their counsel within the room with them and are unable to object. Corcoran being known as as a witness would change his standing from with the ability to act as lawyer, requiring a distinct lawyer to object.)

Not too long ago judges and prosecutors have out of the blue introduced the attorney-client privilege beneath assault, typically beneath the pretext of the “crime/fraud exception.” The “crime/fraud exception” applies solely the place the lawyer is concerned in an on-going or future crime or fraud. There can by no means be any breach of the privilege in regards to the consumer discussing along with his lawyer what occurred up to now. Solely when an lawyer helps a consumer plan or commit against the law – sooner or later (close to or far) – can the privilege be breached. The privilege can’t be breached in a fishing expedition that confidential discussions between lawyer and consumer “may have been part of an attempt to plan a crime.” Courts can’t breach the privilege to search for a purpose to breach the privilege. An lawyer now not performing as an lawyer however as against the law participant should be independently established earlier than the privilege is breached. A inventive gross sales pitch as to why perhaps there is likely to be some proof of against the law inside privileged info turns the privilege on its head. Moreover, solely these privileged supplies intently associated to planning or implementing a future or on-going crime will be examined. The exception doesn’t permit widespread examination of all communications or paperwork, solely these tightly associated to a crime or fraud through which the lawyer abandons his function as an lawyer.

The place the “crime/fraud exception” is established, solely info tightly centered on these circumstances will be examined. Howell’s ruling shreds the protections of the Fourth Modification and Due Course of, as a result of it permits prosecutors to go on the lookout for one thing to justify after the very fact their resolution to go searching in privileged communications and paperwork. After which Howell permits that excuse for use for a widespread, free-wheeling fishing expedition into privileged info and conversations.”

“Judge Howell must be investigated and removed from office,” mentioned Tina Ryan of Residents In opposition to Political Persecution. “If We the People petition for these corrupt judges to be investigated, it is up to the Congress to oblige.”

Please contact Rep. Elise Stefanik HERE and encourage her to continue to push for an investigation of Howell. (Please share the knowledge together with her and hyperlink to article).

Please contact Rep. Jim Jordan of the Judiciary Committee HERE and encourage him to continue to push for an investigation of Howell. (Please share the knowledge with him and hyperlink to article).

PLEASE HELP AMERICA’S MAYOR RUDY GIULIANI’S APPEAL HERE!

And keep in mind, ultimately God wins.

---