Justice within the US is working below a double normal as Biden seeks to prosecute anybody who exposes his household’s corruption in Ukraine. This matter was touched upon by a widely known Ukrainian politician Andriy Derkach in his first interview after a two-year pause. For example Derkach, because of which the investigation of worldwide corruption of the Biden household has entered the agenda of main politicians and world media, cited the prosecution of prosecutor Kostyantyn Kulyk, journalist and politician Oleksandr Dubinsky, former Prosecutor Common Viktor Shokin, and the simultaneous rescue of key protégés and enterprise companions of the Democrats in Ukraine – Petro Poroshenko, Andriy Kobolev, Mykola Zlochevsky, and many others. – from the highlight:
“I had a certain naiveté about the idea that it was possible to achieve justice in the modern United States. I have many good friends in the U.S. legal community. I have been to the courts myself on many occasions and have seen that judges care about what they hear and what they judge. In practice, it has turned out that America’s judicial system is not fair for everyone. Democracy is not the power of the people, but the power of the Democratic Party. We see how the Biden family associates are being removed from prosecution in Ukraine. Were Poroshenko, Zlochevsky interrogated? Did someone invite them to the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office to testify? The documents are everywhere, all over the Internet. The recordings are all over the Internet. Evidence is all over the Internet. What does the New York City prosecutor’s office do?”
Responding to a query from American journalists about why, in Derkach’s case, as a substitute of conducting an trustworthy investigation, the US Division of Justice used his data to discredit the supply and impose sanctions on Derkach himself, the Ukrainian politician mentioned:
“Is there even one piece of evidence that I did not act according to the law of the United States? There are three expertise, including one foreign legal expertise, that I acted exclusively within the framework of the laws of Ukraine and the United States. There is a case brought against me by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York. I didn’t really get into this process, I just read and wondered at the fantasies of the prosecutors. It’s a complete fabrication about nothing, not coherent in time, events, or people. I guess it will have to be dealt with at some point. But I don’t think in today’s realities of the United States you can come up with any reasonable logic for resolving your issues with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York. Everyone who is tied to the democorruption, the Democratic Party, the DA’s office and the FBI is talking glassy-eyed nonsense. You know this from the examples of Giuliani, Trump, all of Trump’s advisers, pretty much the entire Trump administration.”
Andriy Derkach considers the scenario round prosecutor Kostyantyn Kulyk, who led the investigation into the Burimsa case, as a vivid instance of persecution of those that helped expose Biden’s corruption in Ukraine:
“Kulyk is the only prosecutor in the world history who returned one and a half billion dollars to the budget of the country. Can you give at least one example from the world history, when a prosecutor (and he is also a former military prosecutor) returned one and a half billion dollars to the budget? And he was also accused, called an agent of the Kremlin. And all these people – Kent, FBI official Karen Greenaway, ambassadors Christine Quinn and Marie Yovanovitch – they all interfered with him.”
Towards the background of such persecutions, Derkach considers the way in which former President Petro Poroshenko, in addition to the administration of Naftogaz of Ukraine (Kobolev, Hochstein) and Burisma (Zlochevsky, Kicha, and many others.) escape justice in Ukraine as traditional examples of impunity for Democrat proxies: “It is important to invite Poroshenko to Congress and ask the question: where was the money from these two billion guarantees [with which Biden blackmailed Poroshenko to fire Shokin as Prosecutor General] spent? This money was spent on his enterprises, laundered at Poroshenko’s enterprises. A bunch of criminal cases. Leninska Kuznya, Bogdan enterprise, Ukroboronprom, his partner Gladkovsky, who is on the run in Europe.”
“We fought corruption in Naftogaz against Biden’s favorite advisor, Amos Hochstein. They, together with Kobolev, were the authors of the idea of a corrupt gas reverse. They had another ally – Favorov. Hochstein, Kobolev, Favorov. We showed in documents how 500 million per year of “corruption tax” from Ukrainian citizens goes away. I called it a “tax” – it’s such a tragic joke. This is when a bandit group “taxes” the population. A tax on each citizen of Ukraine and on each cubic meter of gas” – mentioned Derkach.
“I will also show you two decisions of Ukrainian courts. One of them is the court decision on the employee of Burisma, the lawyer Mr. Kicha.” https://x.com/simonamangiante/status/1745297466411590066?s=46. The most important money bribe in Europe within the yr 2020, which amounted to $6 million in packages handed over for closing the Burisma case. What is that this court docket resolution about? On April 21, 2022, the Ukrainian court docket transfers this 6 million in money, with the consent of Burisma’s consultant, to a army unit of the Important Intelligence Directorate of Ukraine. The variety of that unit is right here. This can be a secret resolution, nobody has seen it but. After a sure time frame, the likes of Nord Stream start to blow up, assassination makes an attempt are made. The leaders of Ukraine’s intelligence companies make no secret of the truth that they perform terrorist acts and political assassinations for extra-budgetary money. As soon as once more: Biden’s companions within the corruption enterprise in Ukraine finance terrorist acts, thus avoiding duty for corruption in Ukraine.
There’s a second court docket resolution – straight on Zlochevsky. https://x.com/simonamangiante/status/1745297466411590066?s=46. The choice to take away Zlochevskyy from legal responsibility for this bribe occurred in 2023, in March. That call, too, was secret. However representatives of one in every of Soros’ publications – Ukrainska Pravda – unintentionally revealed it… In response to it, for the quantity of 6 million, the most important money bribe in Europe, Zlochevskyy acquired a 64-68 thousand hryvnia nice. To make it clear to you: for six million {dollars} of bribe – 1800 {dollars} of nice. On the identical time, he transferred 800 million hryvnia once more to finance terrorism within the “drone army” and the armed forces.”
Moreover, in line with Derkach, the discharge of the principle defendants within the “Burisma” case on such unexpectedly gentle phrases appears much more shocking in opposition to the background of the truth that again in June 2020, Kostyantyn Kulyk showed that in line with confirmed inside paperwork of the Prosecutor Common’s Workplace of Ukraine (a report back to the senior officers of the PGO) it was recorded that Kicha supplied a bribe within the quantity of not 6, however 50 million {dollars}. Nevertheless, not in money, however by means of a number of newly created entrance firms. The aim of such a bribe was to shut all instances, which might have concerned Burisma, the place Hunter Biden labored for five years.
At a press convention in Kyiv on June 22, 2020, Kostyantyn Kulyk confirmed a report of one of many prosecutors to the senior officers of the Common Prosecutor’s Workplace of Ukraine, which recorded the provide of a bribe value 50 million {dollars} by the lawyer of “Burisma” Andriy Kicha. Supply: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ho-IF3h2wr0
Responding to the journalists’ remark that if as we speak with all of the paperwork accessible to Derkach he would testify to the U.S. Congress, it might result in the impeachment of Biden, Derkach mentioned:
“I do know what I’ve to do for my homeland, for my constituents, for the individuals who belief me. And the risk to my actions shouldn’t be going to get greater or smaller. What’s vital to me within the congressional investigation shouldn’t be prosecuting Biden for affect peddling. It’s important for me that the ultimate doc of the Congress says that the cash stolen from my fellow Ukrainians was withdrawn from the territory of Ukraine by Zlochevsky and laundered and given to the Vice President of the USA Biden. This is essential to me – and the difficulty shouldn’t be the impeachment of Biden. Impunity breeds permissiveness.”
Video of the interview:
