After three years of pending lawsuits towards dozens of ladies, Cleveland Browns quarterback Deshaun Watson could also be pressured to testify as soon as once more in one of many final remaining sexual misconduct instances towards him.
An lawyer for a girl who filed a swimsuit towards Watson in October 2022 requested a Harris County, Texas courtroom to compel Watson to testify in an in-person deposition earlier than Aug. 1, according to paperwork obtained by USA As we speak.
“Plaintiff seeks an order from this Court compelling the re-deposition of Defendant Watson in order to propound allowable discovery and have such answers produced,” mentioned the courtroom submitting submitted by David Bickham, one of many girl’s attorneys.
Watson final appeared for deposition on this case again in June. Nevertheless, the deposition was transient as a result of Watson’s lawyer, Rusty Hardin, improperly compelled Watson to not reply questions associated to different pending instances, like asking whether or not he had been sexually aroused throughout different therapeutic massage periods. Watson confronted 26 ladies accusing him of sexual misconduct throughout therapeutic massage periods. Watson and his lawyer claimed the quarterback typically had consensual sexual encounters throughout therapeutic massage periods however denied any wrongdoing. The Cleveland Browns quarterback reached undisclosed settlements with 23 of the 26 ladies. One dropped her case shortly after submitting it, and two extra stay.
On this specific case, Hardin aggressively denies that Watson allegedly pressured this girl into oral intercourse in December 2020. Hardin accused the woman of unrequited love and tore into considered one of her attorneys, Anissah Nguyen, over a line of questioning to Watson.
“Not only is your lawsuit irrational and has no value at all, but we are not going to be trying other incidents in other cases,” Hardin mentioned to Nguyen, in response to the transcript obtained by USA As we speak. “There’s no secret in the world that he was sued by multiple women and settled multiple lawsuits. But we are not going to try those cases again, and we’re not going to be answering questions about those other cases, all of which are the subject of Confidentiality Agreements.
“You − you jumped in at the last minute,” Hardin continued. “The evidence is going to show and has shown already with the filings just what a bogus lawsuit this is. And you can’t just file a lawsuit against a man that has some money and then get to go into any and everything. Not going to happen. If you want to take it to the Court, you can do so, but he is not going to answer about other incidents. You ask a man to come in here and ask did he ever get an erection during a massage, we’re not answering those kind of questions. We will answer anything you want about (the plaintiff in the case) and her − and his encounter with her.”
