As allegations of plagiarism swirl round Harvard president Claudine Homosexual, extra gasoline has been added to the fireplace.
Harvard stated a evaluate of Homosexual’s 1997 Ph.D. dissertation discovered extra examples of “duplicative language without appropriate attribution,” in response to The Boston Globe.
“President Gay will update her dissertation correcting these instances of inadequate citation,” a abstract of the report stated.
Final week, Harvard’s governing board admitted there have been “a few instances of inadequate citation” in two articles by Homosexual, however indicated the matter could be settled by Homosexual requesting corrections from the journals wherein these articles had been revealed.
The board issued a public endorsement of Homosexual amid the scandal and criticism of congressional testimony this month wherein Homosexual refused to say whether or not requires the genocide of Jews violated Harvard’s code of conduct.
Now, regardless of the invention of extra flaws in Homosexual’s writing, Harvard remains to be sticking by her.
The board concluded that the “inadequate citation” in Homosexual’s dissertation “did not constitute research misconduct” as a result of it was not completed “intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly.”
A congressional inquiry into Harvard’s dealing with of the plagiarism allegations was introduced on Wednesday, just some hours earlier than the board’s findings had been launched.
Carol Swain, a political scientist and former professor at Vanderbilt College whose work was utilized by Homosexual, stated she was “livid” about how Harvard is shrugging off the incident, in response to The New York Times.
“I also have a concern that Harvard University decides it gets to redefine what plagiarism is when it suits its needs,” she stated. “That to me is unacceptable.”
Inside Harvard, some additionally discovered the executive assist for Homosexual’s actions untenable.
“It’s troubling to see the standards we apply to undergrads seem to differ from the standards we apply to faculty,” stated Theda Skocpol, a professor of presidency.
Within the wider educational neighborhood, the allegations towards Homosexual have prompted criticism.
“If this were a stand-alone instance, it would be reprehensible but perhaps excused as the blunder of someone working hastily,” stated Peter Wooden, a former affiliate provost of Boston College, in response to The Washington Free Beacon.
“But that excuse vanishes as the examples multiply,” he stated.
One professor instructed Harvard’s image is being sullied.
“The question here is whether the president of an elite institution such as Harvard can feasibly have an academic record this marred by obvious plagiarism,” stated Alexander Riley, a sociologist at Bucknell College.
“I do not see how Harvard could possibly justify keeping her in that position in light of this evidence.”
Because the allegations got here to mild earlier this month, Homosexual defended herself in an announcement, in response to The Boston Globe.
“I stand by the integrity of my scholarship. Throughout my career, I have worked to ensure my scholarship adheres to the highest academic standards,” she stated.
This text appeared initially on The Western Journal.
