An Indiana Catholic couple, Mary and Jeremy Cox, are taking their authorized battle to the Supreme Court docket after their son was faraway from their dwelling by the state authorities for not utilizing his most well-liked gender pronouns.
In 2019, their son declared a feminine gender id, which the Coxes, religious Catholics, didn’t acknowledge in accordance with their non secular beliefs. They as a substitute sought remedy for what they thought-about underlying psychological well being points.
“The Coxes also believed that he needed help for underlying mental health concerns, including an eating disorder. To address both issues, they provided therapeutic care for their child’s gender dysphoria and scheduled appointments with a specialist to help him with the eating disorder,” in line with the press release.
The Indiana Division of Youngster Providers began an investigation in 2021 when it got here to mild that the Coxes weren’t addressing their son by his chosen title and pronouns.
Regardless of the absence of abuse, Indiana officers determined that the couple’s non-acceptance of their son’s gender id was dangerous to the kid’s psychological well being and contributed to an consuming dysfunction, resulting in the kid’s elimination. He was positioned in a foster dwelling that affirmed his transgender id.
In keeping with Indiana state officers, the kid “should be in a home where she is [ac] accepted for who she is.”
The press launch added, “The court restricted the Coxes’ visitation time to a few hours once a week and barred them from speaking to their child about their religious views on human sexuality and gender identity.”
“After completing its investigation, Indiana made an about-face and abandoned all allegations against Mary and Jeremy, admitting that the accusations of abuse were unsubstantiated. However, Indiana surprised the parents by arguing that the disagreement over gender identity was distressing to their child and contributed to his eating disorder—even though that disorder became worse after he was removed and placed in a transition-affirming home. The trial court relied on Indiana’s argument to keep the child out of his parents’ custody and keep the gag order in place. In short, even though the court agreed that the Coxes were fit parents, it upheld the removal of their child. An appeals court upheld the removal.”
WATCH:
NEW: Catholic Indiana couple appeals to Supreme Court docket after their little one was taken from them after they refused to seek advice from him as his most well-liked pronouns.
Utter madness.
In 2021, the Indiana Division of Youngster Providers investigated dad and mom Mary and Jeremy Cox and later took… pic.twitter.com/XsFRBKoadn
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) February 21, 2024
Almost two years following their little one’s elimination by Indiana authorities, Mary and Jeremy had been left with no selection however to hunt intervention from the Supreme Court docket.
On February 15, 2024, the Becket Fund for Spiritual Liberty, alongside the Hershberger Legislation Workplace, filed a reply transient on the Supreme Court docket, Reply Brief in M.C. and J.C. v. Indiana Department of Child Services, difficult the Indiana court docket choices and urging the safety of parental rights to boost kids consistent with their religion.
Mary and Jeremy Cox preserve that their actions had been motivated by deeply held non secular beliefs and contend that the state has unjustly infringed upon their proper to boost their little one in line with these beliefs.
“This is what every parent is afraid of. We love our son and wanted to care for him, but the state of Indiana robbed us of that opportunity by taking him from our home and banning us from speaking to him about gender,” Mary and Jeremy Cox mentioned in a press release.
“We are hopeful that the Justices will take our case and protect other parents from having to endure the nightmare we did,” the couple added.
Lori Windham, senior counsel at Becket, asserts that the authorized consequence might set a nationwide precedent, probably affecting numerous different households.
“If this can happen in Indiana, it can happen anywhere. Tearing a child away from loving parents because of their religious beliefs, which are shared by millions of Americans, is an outrage to the law, parental rights, and basic human decency,” Windham mentioned. “If the Supreme Court doesn’t take this case, how many times will this happen to other families?”
This case echoes the case of Todd and Krista Kolstad, whose 14-year-old daughter was allegedly taken from them by Montana’s Youngster Protecting Providers and moved to Wyoming for gender transition remedy, ensuing within the complete lack of their custody rights.
The Gateway Pundit beforehand reported that their daughter was transported to Wyoming, a state with completely different legal guidelines concerning the medical transition of minors, by the Montana CPS for remedy of her sudden onset “gender dysphoria,” regardless of the dad and mom’ specific disapproval.
Following her transport to Wyoming, the Kolstad’s daughter was subjected to social transition measures like chest binding and is now below session for contraception to halt her menses, actions that align with a mannequin criticized as a quick observe from social to medical transition.
The Montana Youngster and Household Providers (CFS) petitioned the court docket to completely revoke their custody of Jennifer and organize for her switch to her organic mom in Canada, who has been an absent mother or father for the previous seven years.
