The American Suppose-Tank Institute for the Research of Battle launched an article known as ‘The High Price of Losing Ukraine: Military-Strategic and Financial Implications of Russian Victory’.
The textual content is riddled with pro-NATO propaganda indifferent from actuality, as you’ll count on – but it surely additionally brings a set of startling admissions that go a lot deeper than what’s ‘allowed’ in MSM experiences.
In response to the ISW textual content, the USA ‘has a much higher stake in Russia’s struggle on Ukraine than most individuals suppose’.
“A Russian conquest of all of Ukraine is by no means impossible if the United States cuts off all military assistance and Europe follows suit.”
That’s it: as a substitute of speaking a couple of ‘stalemate’, the Suppose Tank talks about Russian troops going so far as NATO’s border from the Black Sea to the Arctic Ocean.
Russia changed manpower losses and are ramping up their industrial base, reworking it into an excellent deadlier drive.
“A victorious Russian army at the end of this war will be combat experienced and considerably larger than the pre-2022 Russian land forces.”
The Russian financial system will progressively recuperate, ISW believes, as sanctions erode and Moscow circumvents or mitigates the remaining ones.
“It is going to convey with it superior air protection programs that solely American stealth plane—badly wanted to discourage and confront China—can reliably penetrate. Russia can pose a significant typical army menace to NATO for the primary time for the reason that Nineteen Nineties
To discourage and defend towards a renewed Russian menace following a full Russian victory in Ukraine the USA must deploy to Japanese Europe a large portion of its floor forces.”
Within the occasion of a whole Ukrainian defeat, the US ‘will have to station in Europe a large number of stealth aircraft’.
There’ll come a time to make a ‘terrible choice between keeping enough in Asia to defend Taiwan and its other Asian allies and deterring or defeating a Russian attack on a NATO ally’.
“Helping Ukraine keep the lines where they are through continuous Western military support is far more advantageous and cheaper for the United States than allowing Ukraine to lose.”
With out Western assist, Ukraine’s capability to carry off the Russian army will collapse.
“Russian forces could push all the way to the western Ukrainian border in such a scenario and establish new military bases on the borders of Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, and Romania. The Russians are preparing occupation military forces to handle the almost inevitable Ukrainian insurgency while leaving front line troops free to threaten NATO.”
The USA would want to maneuver massive numbers of American troopers to all the jap NATO border from the Baltic to the Black Sea, in addition to a big proportion of its fleet of stealth plane completely to Europe.
“NATO defense strategy relies on air superiority not merely to protect NATO troops from enemy attack but also to use air power to offset smaller NATO ground forces and limited stocks of NATO artillery.”
This is able to occur throughout ‘a period of very high risk when US forces were not adequately prepared or postured to handle either Russia or China, let alone both together’.
Learn extra:
Mainstream Media Bitterly Comes to Terms With Vladimir Putin’s Successes in the Ukraine War
