Medical professionals are being urged to contemplate the potential dangers related to blood transfusions utilizing blood merchandise from people who’ve skilled lengthy COVID or have been recipients of genetic vaccines, together with mRNA vaccines. This warning comes amidst rising considerations over the unknown results such vaccines could have on blood merchandise and the doable well being dangers concerned.
A groundbreaking research printed earlier this month in Preprints.org by a workforce of researchers led by Jun Ueda on the Asahikawa Medical College, Hokkaido, Japan, has ignited a world dialog concerning the security of blood transfusions from donors vaccinated in opposition to COVID-19 with genetic vaccines.
The World Well being Group declared the coronavirus pandemic in March 2020, resulting in an unprecedented international vaccination effort. The vaccines, designed to fight the SARS-CoV-2 virus, make the most of modified mRNA encoding the spike protein to elicit an immune response.
Whereas these vaccines have performed an important function in controlling the pandemic, rising proof suggests potential post-vaccination problems that would impression the protection of blood transfusions.
This idea, described within the paper as “spikeopathy,” posits that the spike protein’s presence in blood transfusions might result in varied well being points, together with thrombosis (blood clots), cardiovascular issues, and a big selection of systemic illnesses affecting a number of organs.
The research meticulously evaluations the prevailing literature and studies on post-vaccination phenomena, such because the persistence of vaccine parts like mRNA and lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) within the bloodstream of vaccinated people.
It highlights considerations that these parts won’t solely stay within the donor’s blood however may be handed on to recipients by means of transfusions, doubtlessly resulting in unintended well being penalties.
Zero Hedge reported:
Repeated vaccinations could make individuals extra weak to COVID-19, it mentioned. If the blood incorporates spike proteins, it turns into essential to take away these proteins previous to administration, and there’s no such expertise at present obtainable, the authors wrote.
Opposite to earlier expectations, genes and proteins from genetic vaccines have been discovered to persist within the blood of vaccine recipients for “prolonged periods of time.”
As well as, “a variety of adverse events resulting from genetic vaccines are now being reported worldwide.” This contains a variety of illnesses associated to blood and blood vessels.
Some research have reported that the spike protein within the mRNA vaccines is neurotoxic and able to crossing the blood-brain barrier, the evaluation acknowledged. “Thus, there is no longer any doubt that the spike protein used as an antigen in genetic vaccines is itself toxic.”
Furthermore, individuals who have taken a number of pictures of mRNA vaccines can have a number of exposures to the identical antigen inside a small timeframe, which can result in them being “imprinted with a preferential immune response to that antigen.”
This has resulted in COVID-19 vaccine recipients changing into “more susceptible to contracting COVID-19.”
The research articulated the decision for heightened vigilance, highlighting the absence of complete knowledge on the impression of genetic vaccines on blood merchandise and the potential harm they may trigger.
The authors of the research strongly advocated for the suspension of the vaccination marketing campaign utilizing genetic vaccines till a radical harm-benefit evaluation is performed.
In mild of this, the research suggests discarding all such blood merchandise till an answer is discovered. The authors draw parallels with current studies of encephalitis in people who acquired blood from dengue vaccine recipients, underscoring the inadequacy of the present system for managing blood merchandise.
The Gateway Pundit previously reported that the American Crimson Cross doesn’t separate blood donations primarily based on the COVID-19 vaccination standing of the donors.
The American Red Cross website clarifies its place, stating it follows FDA steerage for blood donation eligibility post-COVID-19 vaccination. Deferral occasions could range relying on the vaccine sort administered. Donors who’ve been inoculated with an inactivated or RNA-based vaccine from AstraZeneca, Janssen/J&J, Moderna, Novavax, or Pfizer are sometimes not deferred, offered they’re symptom-free and feeling effectively on the time of donation.
Nevertheless, the undercover recording reveals that the Crimson Cross doesn’t monitor or separate blood primarily based on vaccination standing. Which means sufferers requiring transfusions might unknowingly obtain blood from vaccinated donors.
Undercover Journalist: “Do you guys track that?”
Crimson Cross: “Track vaccinated versus unvaccinated?”
Undercover Journalist: “Yeah. Like, ending up to the patient?”
Crimson Cross: “No. So, some individuals have had the vaccine two years in the past and are nonetheless experiencing some sort of signs. In order that’s why we particularly ask concerning that one. Like, for example, I’ve had one donor earlier than name in, and after she acquired the vaccine, her physician was capable of finding that she had a direct correlation to ringing within the ears afterwards. And so we see that as a symptom. So something irregular, and it nonetheless proceeds to today. So she basically wasn’t eligible to donate. In order that’s why now we have to ask, simply due to any sort of symptom; it’s not essentially restricted to only fever or nausea or something of that kind.
In September, a mom informed The Gateway Pundit that her one-month-old child died from a blood clot attributable to receiving “COVID-vaccinated blood” throughout a blood transfusion.
“He died after getting a blood transfusion of vaccinated blood,” Hertzler claimed. “He got a blood clot instantly after receiving his transfusion. A blood clot that no blood thinner could resolve.”
Alexander was born with a throat downside that may solely be handled with surgical procedure. Hertzler claimed that her son was given the blood by the physician at Sacred Coronary heart in Spokane, Washington, with out her or her husband’s permission.
“He had an operation to fix an issue in his throat he was born with. He did not need a blood transfusion during the operation. Most babies do not.”
“Later on, after our authorization had expired (we only authorized a blood transfusion in case of an emergency during an operation). The doctor gave him a blood transfusion because his hemoglobin levels were a little low. We had not given permission for this and the doctor knew we did not want vaccinated blood because we were worried about blood clots. The next day after the transfusion, they discovered a blood clot,” Hertzler mentioned.
Additionally, The Gateway Pundit reported in 2022 {that a} New Zealand excessive courtroom decide sided with well being officers who sought guardianship of a child boy after his mother and father refused to permit him to obtain a transfusion of “vaccinated blood” for his surgical procedure.
The Well being New Zealand, also referred to as Te Whatu Ora, filed an software with the Auckland Excessive Court docket on Monday to switch guardianship beneath the Care of Kids Act in order that the newborn can endure surgical procedure.
The mother and father mentioned in an interview with Liz Gunn, a broadcaster from New Zealand, that their child, Will, has extreme pulmonary valve stenosis and requires surgical procedure “very immediately,” however they’re “significantly involved with the blood the medical doctors are going to make use of.
There have been reportedly 20 potential unvaccinated blood donors who have been prepared to donate, however the New Zealand authorities didn’t approve this.
