Queen Elizabeth II was reportedly livid over her great-granddaughter’s identify … based on a royal writer who simply revived the Palace vs. Prince Harry/Meghan Markle fallout.
Robert Hardman is looking BS on H&M’s claims the Queen was supportive of her childhood moniker being handed on to their little lady, Princess Lilibet … writing in a bombshell extract from his new bio, “Charles III: New King. New Court. The Inside Story,” she was the angriest he’d ever seen her over it.
This backs the assertion from BBC’s royal correspondence, Jonny Dymond, shortly after Lilibet’s birth on June 4, 2021 … stating the couple by no means mentioned something to the Queen about utilizing the identify — not to mention get her permission for it.
One other report from Each day Mail doubles down on the brand new ebook’s claims … saying the Queen was already pissed off she did not personal her personal palaces or work … just for Harry and Megs to take the very last thing she owned — her identify.
The report cites an nameless supply who claims Liz mentioned one thing to the impact of … “‘I don’t own the palaces, I don’t own the paintings, the only thing I own is my name. And now they’ve taken that.”
The Queen was additionally reportedly bowled over when she discovered Harry’s intention to call his daughter Lilibet … however felt like she could not publicly say no.
Nonetheless, this new naming and shaming is simply the newest barb in H&M’s continued estrangement from the royal household … we’re certain it will be over one thing new subsequent week.
As for the age-old query of what is in a reputation … apparently so much for the late QE2!
Ya gotta marvel if Harry and Meg will push again on this newest declare — they have an inclination to get fairly defensive over this sorta stuff.