Russell Brand is vehemently denying accusations he received drunk on a film set and sexually assaulted an actress … he says there isn’t any approach her claims are true, as a result of he was sober.
In new authorized docs, obtained by TMZ, Russell pushes again on a lawsuit alleging he uncovered his penis to a lady on the set of the film “Arthur,” after which sexually assaulted her in a rest room.
Russell claims he would not recall the actress who’s suing him over the alleged 2010 incident, and he says her complete go well with rests on the false declare he was intoxicated on set.
RB says he was simply taking part in a drunk within the film … and he hasn’t completed medication or had a sip of alcohol since Dec. 13, 2002 … claiming he was 8 years sober on the time of the alleged assault.
Within the docs, filed by his lawyer Andrew Brettler, Russell says the girl “is unable to distinguish acting from reality.” He says his job was to “act drunk and portray a drunk,” however “he did not drink a sip of alcohol or consume any drugs at any time during production.”
As we reported … Russell’s accuser, who’s suing as a Jane Doe, claims previous to the alleged assault he “appeared intoxicated, smelled of alcohol, and was carrying a bottle of vodka on set.”
Russell says the vodka bottle was only a prop for the movie … and contained no actual booze.
The lady claims Russell adopted her into a rest room the place he sexually assaulted her … however he says that is not true both, claiming her reminiscence is “faulty.”
TMZ Studios
The accuser claimed she was employed to work the film for 3 days, however wasn’t introduced again after the alleged assault occurred on her first day. Russell says he would not acknowledge her by her title or {photograph} and would not recall any interplay along with her in any way.
