Strain Grows on MIT President To Cease Antisemitic Incidents | The Gateway Pundit

This story initially was printed by Real Clear Wire

By Susan Crabtree
Actual Clear Wire

When unrest started to roil college campuses throughout america within the weeks after Hamas’ horrific Oct. 7 assaults in Israel, many school and directors thought it was solely short-term and would seemingly subside by Thanksgiving.

When protests persevered, and Jewish college students and college complained a couple of wave of antisemitic incidents and rhetoric, some directors assumed the turmoil would recede after winter break. The acts of discrimination, intimidation, and harassment in opposition to Jewish college students haven’t solely continued, they’ve metastasized right into a systemic degree of abuse that threatens the schools’ core tutorial and analysis missions.

At a few of the most prestigious universities within the nation, the extent of vitriol and sheer quantity of anti-Jewish hate poses new threats to school leaders permitting the hostility to pervade campus life.

Early this yr, Sally Kornbluth, president of the Massachusetts Institute of Expertise, seemed to be the lone survivor of a disastrous congressional listening to in December by which she and the presidents of Harvard and the College of Pennsylvania all refused to explicitly say that requires the genocide of Jewish folks violate campus guidelines of harassment.

Penn President Liz Magill resigned inside days of her testimony amid a backlash of intense criticism from donors and alums. A couple of weeks later, a plagiarism scandal engulfed Harvard President Claudine Homosexual, snowballing with outrage over her congressional efficiency to topple Homosexual from her publish.

MIT graduates and present school interviewed for this text attribute Kornbluth’s survival at the least partly to the college’s give attention to laborious sciences. MIT’s alumni, these sources say, are likely to take a extra muted strategy to voicing their complaints in comparison with different Ivy League colleges identified extra for his or her social science energy. Harvard’s and Penn’s well-known donors, many with giant social media followings, publicly unloaded their outrage and demanded Magill’s and Homosexual’s removing.

However Kornbluth has her share of vocal critics who contend that the MIT Company’s endorsement of her dealing with of the post-Oct. 7 scholar unrest relies on its allegiance to Variety, Fairness, and Inclusion dogma. The college administration’s insistence that the protests and anti-Israel activism are below management stands at odds with the experiences of many Jewish MIT college students and college.

“In terms of the situation at MIT, I don’t think it’s any better than Harvard or Penn,” Retsef Levi, an operations administration MIT professor, advised RealClearPolitics.

“These pervasive hostile and harassing conditions have really devastated the Jewish and Israeli students, faculty and staff, essentially making it unsustainable for many of them to feel safe on campus to do their research and pursue the educational activities they came to MIT to do,” Levi lamented. “It’s a failure to protect the core mission of MIT.”

A lot of the resentment boils all the way down to what many within the Jewish group view as a double normal. Kornbluth, they argue, can’t sq. the college’s entrenched DEI tradition and its anti-hate speech insurance policies and prohibitions in opposition to discrimination with its tolerance of an extremely vocal faction of the coed physique calling for “Intifada” and the outright destruction of Israel.

Some pro-Palestinian college students and college at MIT argue they will name for the elimination of Israel and the Zionist motion with out concentrating on the Jewish folks as a complete. However Jewish college students and college say that’s unimaginable – calls to finish Zionism hit them at their core and represent an assault on their heritage and identification.

Whereas the talk rages on, MIT is struggling to maintain order and permit Jewish college students and college to pursue their college research and work. Kornbluth and the MIT Company have been permitting the assaults in opposition to Israel and requires the murdering of Jews within the title of free speech so long as they don’t goal people or escalate into violence.

Like different universities throughout the nation, MIT clearly by no means anticipated having to referee this existential conflict and was woefully unprepared to deal with it. However after practically six months of protests and a sequence of antisemitic incidents, indignant Jewish school and college students argue MIT’s insurance policies aren’t adapting, and the college is failing to guard Jewish college students and college below near-constant assault.

The preamble to MIT’s scholar handbook governing habits states, “In order to create a respectful, welcoming, and productive community, the Institute is committed to providing a living, working, and learning environment that is free from discrimination and discriminatory harassment.”

Anti-harassment coaching required of all MIT college students and college stated the college would think about “deadnaming” somebody, i.e., utilizing any LGBTQ+ individual’s former title, can be thought of a “violent act,” in keeping with a slide labeled “LGBTQ+ 101: Education, Allyship and Self-Advocacy.”

Thus far, Kornbluth has promoted the narrative that “things are not as bad at MIT, and ‘most’ people feel ‘safe,’” Levi stated. “But that’s just gaslighting what the [Jewish] community is talking and reporting about.”

When the unrest on faculty campuses erupted final fall, high-profile Jewish leaders in Wall Avenue and political arenas sought to shift the DEI mannequin to make Jewish folks a part of the marginalized protected class. However billionaire hedge-fund supervisor Invoice Ackman and his supporters rapidly turned on the variety packages themselves, arguing that the efforts, whereas selling noble-sounding targets, have gone off the rails and are getting used to normalize assaults in opposition to Jewish college students and college.

Some within the MIT group take situation with DEI’s dominant function in admissions and particular person departments’ focus and curricula. The distinguished science and engineering establishment had traditionally operated as a meritocracy. Additionally they blame DEI for selling a simplistic  “oppressor vs. oppressed” mannequin that casts Jews as folks of white European ancestry and the oppressor in opposition to persecuted Palestinians. That framing just isn’t solely traditionally inaccurate, these critics say, however excuses hate speech in opposition to Jews.

Kornbluth factors to her suspension of a scholar group engaged in anti-Israeli protests for violating campus protest guidelines as proof of her willingness to take motion. However critics say the members of the group, the Coalition In opposition to Apartheid, or CAA, had been by no means suspended from college and rapidly reconstituted into in a different way titled teams with the identical actions and targets, whereas primarily taunting the administration.

Talia Khan, a graduate scholar and president of the MIT Israel Alliance, testified earlier than Congress in December that the varsity has change into “overrun with toxic antisemitism.” Khan, the daughter of a Jewish mom and an Afghan Muslim father, stated MIT management has completed nothing to self-discipline the scholars accountable, together with CAA members who organized the protests that violated college guidelines and have fashioned new organizations below totally different names.

“They have literally been sending emails signed, ‘Yours Truly, the CAA,’ with the CAA struck through and the group Reading for Revolution listed under it,” Khan advised RCP.

But Kornbluth continues to quote the CAA suspension as proof that she is taking motion to make sure a protected tutorial and analysis setting. “We have clear, reasonable ‘time, place, and manner’ policies in place for a good reason,” Kornbluth stated in a video explaining CAA’s suspension launched to the scholars and college. “The point of these policies is to make sure that members of the MIT community can work, learn, and do their work on campus without disruption.”

“We also need to keep the community safe – and we can’t do that without enough advance notice to organize staff and police resources,” she continued. “That’s why we have the rules.”

Kornbluth concluded her assertion by urging college students and college to discover a solution to categorical their political opinions with “a basic sense of respect and empathy for other members of our community,” noting that “we do not tolerate threats to physical safety.”

“In a time of exceptional turmoil and polarization, I don’t see how we can do the important work of MIT if we can’t find a way to speak to what’s important to us without damaging the fabric of our community,” she stated. “We must find a way to live and work together.”

Khan and different critics view such statements as little greater than gaslighting. The college honored Isa Liggans, a identified CAA member who organized a November protest that blocked a foyer in a most important college constructing, with an undergraduate MLK management award. Additionally they gave Austin Cole, a graduate scholar CAA member, a talking function on the Feb. 17 MLK Celebration Gala. Cole then used his speech to ask attendees to the stage and conduct an anti-Israel protest on the gala as Kornbluth appeared on in silence.

“Unfortunately, some of the major activists in CAA not only suffer no personal consequences but were recently awarded with speaking honors and prizes, which I really find outrageous,” Levi stated.

Now, Kornbluth faces her largest problem but. Two pro-Hamas scholar teams lately focused a number of Israeli and Jewish MIT professors and the scholars who work with them in an try and disrupt and finish their tutorial analysis initiatives. The trouble undermines Kornbluth’s promise just some weeks in the past when suspending the CAA to permit tutorial and analysis work to proceed undisturbed.

On March 8, a scholar group referred to as the MIT Coalition for Palestine despatched emails to a number of professors and college students working with them. The letters criticized their analysis work as a result of at the least some or all of it was sponsored by or affiliated with Israel’s Ministry of Protection.

“We believe that to collaborate directly with a militant force actively committing genocide is to be complicit in their crimes against humanity,” Safiyyah Ogundipe, scholar chief of the group, wrote to a number of professors in emails obtained by RealClearPolitics.

The group’s scholar chief requested the professors for remark by noon Tuesday of the next week and implored them to “immediately cease these projects.”

One other chief of the MIT Coalition for Palestine despatched different extra nuanced emails to a number of college students working with the focused professors. The messages urged the scholars to take motion, urgent them to request the supply of their analysis funding and to resign from the initiatives in the event that they felt snug doing so.

“We were shocked to find such direct complicity on MIT’s campus, a place of learning and exploration, and now, we feel it is our duty to expose these abuses of scientific work for egregious militarism, particularly during an active genocide,” Aaliya Hussain, a member of the MIT Coalition for Palestine, wrote in an e mail to these college students.

It’s unclear if any of the professors or college students responded to the emails or took any motion associated to them. The MIT Coalition for Palestine’s Ogundipe and Hussain didn’t reply to an RCP inquiry.

On Tuesday, the pro-Palestinian group shared their findings on Instagram by way of the CAA’s and MIT Graduates for Palestine’s accounts. In a publish with a picture of MIT’s iconic Nice Dome dripping in blood, the teams wrote, “Hey MIT, why are you doing research for the IOF?” (The IOF reference is a pejorative time period referring to the Israel Protection Forces because the Israel Occupation Forces or the Israel Offensive Forces.)

“Breaking down MIT’s decade-long complicity in providing technology for genocide of the Palestinians,” the teams continued on the Instagram slides, noting that the college has acquired tens of millions of {dollars} in analysis funding from the Ministry of Protection of Israel.

One educated MIT supply, nonetheless, says the U.S. Congress offered the cash with the analysis sponsored by the IDF. The publish lists its sources as “MIT VPF Brown Book,” audit experiences, and “an internal grant management tool,” which is simply accessible to MIT school, not college students. For some members of MIT’s Jewish group, it was the final straw – and a transparent violation of Kornbluth’s pledge to guard the college’s tutorial and analysis work.

“These students are using peer pressure to try to tear apart research groups,” one MIT professor who requested anonymity advised RCP. “They’re starting to blacklist faculty.” The professor additionally identified that at the least one school member seemingly helped the MIT Coalition for Palestine group entry the inner grant administration instrument.

MIT spokeswoman Kimberly Allen didn’t reply to a query on whether or not Kornbluth condones the efforts to blacklist professors and their analysis. She additionally didn’t say whether or not anybody within the college management has intervened and disciplined the scholars for sending the emails condemning sure analysis initiatives as contributing to Palestinian “genocide.”

She didn’t reply to a query concerning the sources of the analysis funding.

“We underscore that MIT supports the excellent work of its faculty and labs,” Allen stated in an announcement. “As with all sponsored research at MIT, the projects mentioned involve work that is open and publishable and that contributes to knowledge that is freely available to scientists worldwide.”

“MIT faculty and researchers regularly work with scientists and entities in other countries, including Israel, following required due diligence for international projects. MIT strongly supports the principles of academic freedom that enable our faculty to engage with a wide array of partners in the pursuit of knowledge.”

To Khan and others, the administration’s failure to publicly condemn and punish college students making an attempt to disrupt tutorial analysis is simply emboldening them. “Nothing’s happened,” Khan advised RCP. “They’re continuing to do exactly what they’ve been doing the whole time, which is to harass Jews and Israelis on campus, in their dorms.”

“MIT thinks that it can keep putting little band-aids on and stopping the spill, but the dam is going to break,” she predicted. The concentrating on of professors and efforts to close down analysis initiatives is simply the most recent flashpoint in an extended record, and there are indicators {that a} greater backlash is brewing. Throughout a Nov. 9 protest, the CAA absolutely blocked MIT’s Foyer 7, the primary entrance to the college, a violation of the college’s insurance policies in opposition to indoor protests and blocking college students’ entry to school rooms and workplaces. When Jewish college students responded with their very own counter-protest, MIT management issued a written warning handed out to college students that anybody remaining in Foyer 7 after 12:15 pm can be topic to suspension.

The Jewish protesters left, however CAA selected to remain and defy the president’s orders. Later within the day, following data circulating on social media concerning the protest, quite a few protestors unaffiliated with the college arrived. Warnings had been then issued by the MIT Police and Hillel Heart for Jewish Life, a Jewish faculty group, to keep away from Foyer 7.

“MIT Hillel recommends that you do not directly engage the protestors for your physical safety and wellbeing,” a discover reads. “You may want to choose paths around campus that avoid Lobby 7.”

Roughly a month later, CAA hosted Miko Peled, a distinguished Israeli who sympathizes with the Palestinian trigger. College students who attended reported that Peled inspired college students to go to the Hillel Heart and demand solutions from Jewish college students.

“You go to Hillel and whatever the mascot is there and tell them they need to answer how they don’t condemn the genocide in Gaza,” Peled stated, in keeping with an account within the record of incidents.

The identical day Peled made these statements, a person unaffiliated with the college approached college students at Hillel and accused them of being Mossad brokers. He then peered by way of a Hillel lounge window and peed on it whereas the scholars watched, in keeping with the record.

One non-Jewish scholar was so postpone by the hostility towards Jewish college students going down in her majority pro-Palestinian dorm that the coed penned an e mail to a pro-Jewish group sharing her considerations concerning the antisemitic dorm rhetoric.

“They say that Israeli Jews, including children, ‘deserve’ the violence perpetuated against them for residing in Israel while Palestine is occupied, and that Jews as a whole ‘deserve’ the treatment given to them at MIT and other universities if they support Israel,” the coed wrote, noting that some college students reported they had been required to specific their assist for Palestinians and/or condemn Israel or danger being labeled a “genocide supporter.”

At a Dec. 14 protest at MIT’s Hockfield Courtroom, crowds cheered for requires “armed resistance” and others to “hold a knife to their throats,” in keeping with the compilation of protest-related incidents circulating among the many college’s Jewish group. The compilation notes the opportunity of the phrases having figurative moderately than literal that means, however nonetheless considers them deeply regarding within the wake of the Oct. 7 bloodbath. An MIT advisory despatched noon knowledgeable college students that “due to a demonstration expected to take place” that afternoon, MIT buildings can be accessible solely by way of an “MIT ID-reader system.”

“Please carry your MIT ID card or Mobile ID for building access.” David French, a lawyer who has defended free speech on campus, together with the speech of Muslim college students and workers members, penned an editorial for the New York Occasions in early March titled, “Harvard, M.I.T. and Systemic Antisemitism.”

In it, he referred to as the litany of antisemitic incidents, together with “acts of violence and physical intimidation,” on each campuses “horrifying.”

The college can be going through a lawsuit filed on March 8 by a number of MIT college students and the StandWithUs Heart for Authorized Justice, or SCLJ. The go well with accuses Kornbluth and different MIT leaders of permitting antisemitism to flourish on campus by tolerating the intimidation and harassment of Jewish college students and college.

The lawsuit argues that MIT management is popping a blind eye to a rising record of incidents that violate Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which requires universities that obtain public funding to guard Jewish college students from discrimination and harassment.

Colombia College, Harvard College, New York College, and the College of Pennsylvania have confronted comparable fits over the previous couple of months.

The lawsuit asserts that Jewish and Israeli MIT college students have deferred commencement dates or exams because of antisemitism on the college. On the identical time, some professors and college have left MIT due to the discrimination they confronted or the hostile work setting created for the reason that Hamas assaults on Israel.

It additionally alleges that Jewish professors reported incidents by which MIT college students disrupted the tutorial setting and intimidated school by yelling outdoors workplaces of MIT’s Israel internship program whereas rattling the doorways. One professor described a pro-Hamas and anti-Israel protest that took over the foyer of a constructing and bodily blocked college students from attending a category.

Moderately than dispersing the protests, the lawsuit asserts that MIT warned Jewish college students to keep away from sure areas of the college, successfully sending the scholars “underground at their own university” with no repercussions for the protesters, making a hostile setting for Jewish college students.

The authorized grievance alleges that protesters provided an $800 bounty for anybody who might establish a Jewish scholar who shoved his manner by way of an space of a constructing blocked by protesters and ripped up a few of the protesters’ materials. The coed was rapidly recognized after the X.com web page “Stop Zionist Hate” shared a video of the altercation and provided the bounty.

A special publish acknowledged that the coed “is wanted all over campus and the city.”

“Zionism and Israel are the scourge of humanity,” the publish by @mehemmmmed declared. “His head should be crushed wherever he is seen.”

In keeping with the grievance, “The student stayed locked up in their dorm for weeks with their friends bringing food, check-ins from police, and their family terrified for [the student’s] safety.”

“While less extreme, there are unfortunately many more cases of doxxing, promoted by MIT students,” notes an inventory of campus-related antisemitic incidents circulating amongst MIT’s Jewish group. The lawsuit asks the courtroom to cease MIT from creating, sustaining, or executing insurance policies that penalize or discriminate in opposition to Jewish college students, requesting the firing of workers and the expelling of scholars “who engage in antisemitic behavior.”

On March 8, the identical day the lawsuit was filed, the GOP-led Home Training and Workforce Committee launched an antisemitism investigation into MIT.

“We have grave concerns regarding the inadequacy of MITs response to antisemitism on its campus,” Foxx wrote.

In her letter, Foxx detailed quite a few antisemitic incidents at MIT which have raised considerations, together with incidents and protests by which the CAA has disrupted class, harassed Jewish college students, promoted violence, and violated different MIT guidelines in “the course of conducting anti-Israel demonstrations and other activities.”

The committee additionally took situation with MIT’s determination to ask Dalia Mogahed, who endorsed Hamas’ terrorist assault on Israel, to a lecture on Islamophobia. Mogahed wrote that “resistance, including struggle against a colonial occupation force, is not only acknowledged under international law but explicitly endorsed” and that “[a]s an occupied population, Palestinians inherently possess the right to resist.”

It wasn’t the primary time MIT school welcomed virulent antisemites who condone terrorism to talk on campus.

The MIT college students’ and SCLJ’s lawsuit takes situation with an MIT CAA-hosted occasion, “Allyship, Art, and Apartheid.” Held Oct. 22, 2022, practically a yr earlier than the Hamas assaults, it featured three audio system, together with Mohammed El-Kurd, a pro-Hamas Palestinian identified for unhinged anti-Jewish hate speech and defending terrorism. El-Kurd has accused Israelis of consuming the organs of Palestinians, extols hijacking of passenger airliners, and at a January rally in London referred to as on Palestinian supporters to “normalize the [Oct. 7] massacres as the status quo.”

Not solely did MIT enable El-Kurd to talk on campus, however a number of different departments, together with the MIT Division of Girls’s and Gender Research, MIT Libraries, MIT Heart for Worldwide Research, and MIT Division of Anthropology, co-sponsored the occasion.

On April 18, 2023, MIT CAA’s Instagram featured a publish a couple of Holocaust show on Yom HaShoah. The publish confirmed that the Holocaust memorial had been defaced with “Free Palestine” slogans. Rep. Foxx additionally drew consideration to “virulently” antisemitic remarks on social media made by a number of MIT school and workers, together with MIT postdoctoral affiliate Afif Aqrabawi.

A self-identified Palestinian-Canadian, Aqrabawi has referred to as Zionism “a mental illness” and denied well-documented experiences of sexual violence by Hamas terrorists in opposition to Israeli girls, dismissing them as “perverted rape fantasies.” (Postdocs are each college students and workers of the college.)

Aqrabawi additionally referred to members of the Israeli navy as “bloodthirsty and perverted Nazis,” all Israelis as “parasites,” and ridiculed Jewish MIT college students’ concern for his or her security. In one in every of his social media posts, the postdoctoral affiliate primarily dared MIT’s leaders to cease him, referring to himself as a check case for freedom of speech. “I don’t know how MIT will respond,” he wrote. “I may lose my job, maybe not. I guess I am the litmus test of whether freedom of free speech truly exists in America.”

When college students complained about Aqrabawi’s social media remarks, an MIT school member serving because the affiliate division head for Variety, Fairness and Inclusion and Justice for Aqrabawi’s division denied that the postdoctoral affiliate’s public feedback had been antisemitic, in keeping with the Education and Workforce Committee’s account.

As an alternative, the consultant warned the scholars: “I would be very cautious before accusing any one of our colleagues, staff, or trainees of hate speech.”

In the meantime, Sophia Hasenfus, an MIT Variety, Fairness, Inclusion, and Belonging officer, a place of DEI management on campus, “liked” a number of excessive anti-Israeli social media posts, together with one stating, “Israel doesn’t have a right to exist, it’s an illegitimate settler-colony like the U.S.”

Throughout the Feb. 13 CAA protest that resulted within the group’s suspension, the group blocked a college constructing’s foyer, and audio system accused Jews and people supporting them of partaking in “white supremacy.” The protesters stated they wanted to have an “emergency” protest in opposition to the Israeli navy’s potential floor invasion of Rafah, town on the southern Gaza border the place 1.4 million Palestinians have fled to flee preventing elsewhere within the battle. The IDF mission led to the rescue of two Hamas-held hostages.

“Our safety is threatened by white supremacy, and the dangerous equation of Zionism,” college students shouted, arguing that the Jewish custom is used to justify Israel’s “colonialist, capitalist, white-supremacist agenda.” Different college students shouted, “Hear us loud, hear us clear, IOF not welcome here.”

All Israeli women and men are required to serve time in Israel’s obligatory navy service program, so the assertion applies to all Israeli college students and college on campus. The next day, Kornbluth suspended the CAA’s privileges as “a recognized student organization” for holding the unauthorized protest however made clear that “suspending CAA is not related to the content of their speech.”

She additionally chastised members engaged in vilifying or shunning Jewish college students whereas concurrently warning in opposition to casting “advocates for the Palestinian people as supporting Hamas.”

Kornbluth’s insistence on utilizing parallel language for the 2 sides of the talk, these critics argue, is meant to disguise the painful actuality: Whereas there have been anti-Muslim incidents, one group of scholars is systematically inciting hatred of one other.

In December, Mauricio Karchmer, a pc scientist who was born in Mexico to a Jewish household and immigrated to america within the Nineteen Eighties, resigned his place as an MIT lecturer after 5 years. He wrote an op-ed titled “Why I Quit My Dream Job at MIT,” blaming “pervasive antisemitism” on MIT’s campus for his departure.

Within the piece, he famous that a number of MIT school members, together with these within the DEI division, endorsed antisemitic statements and slogans demanding the elimination of Israel.

Karchmer now has a brand new function educating at Yeshiva College, a non-public Orthodox Jewish college with 4 campuses in New York Metropolis. In November, he stated, the MIT school publication was virtually “entirely dedicated” to the protests, with a number of professors parroting anti-Israel propaganda. In a single editorial titled, “Standing Together Against Hate: From the River to the Sea, from Gaza to MIT,” linguistics professor Michel DeGraff wrote that the protesters calling for Intifada “have given me hope for the future.”

Karchmer isn’t calling for censorship however, as a substitute, an administration-led acknowledgment that what the pro-Palestinian protesters are shouting about Israel is each hateful and unsuitable. He stated that Kornbluth shouldn’t simply set down imprecise guidelines concerning the course of and weakly say that some issues shouldn’t be stated. She have to be particular and clarify why these statements are factually unsuitable and primarily based in bigotry, he argued.

“If they organize a rally three days in advance, can they then say, ‘Gas the Jews’?” he requested in an interview. “In my view, the problem is that demonizing Israel and denying Israel’s right to exist is considered within the acceptable norms of what a student is permitted to express. It’s not only that they are allowed to voice such views, but in many academic circles, doing so is seen as a way to signal one’s virtues.”

The college additionally seems to be taking actions to guard its personal DEI workers from protesters whereas failing to offer the identical degree of safety for Jewish college students and college.

CAA associates distributed a pamphlet titled “Written Revolution,” which incorporates an open letter to Kornbluth. Within the letter, a scholar recollects a CAA protest held outdoors the Institute Discrimination and Harassment Response, or IDHR, workplace. In keeping with the pamphlet’s creator, the IDHR issued no-contact orders after the occasion, stopping all CAA members from contacting IDHR workers “directly as members of CAA.”

Khan and different MIT critics say the no-contact coverage reveals that directors are conscious of the intimidating habits of CAA members and are taking motion to guard school members however are failing to implement campus-wide insurance policies to safeguard Jewish college students and college.

“The students are more emboldened by the fact that they haven’t been punished at all,” Khan stated. “Now the IDHR doesn’t want anything to do with them.”

“It’s incredibly frustrating to see that literally nothing has been done,” she lamented. “The [school administrators] don’t look us in the eyes anymore.”

This text was initially printed by RealClearPolitics and made accessible by way of RealClearWire.