Image

Tesla bull Dan Ives rips Elon Musk’s ‘practice wreck’ earnings name

Tesla inventory plummeted more than 12% on Thursday after the corporate missed analysts’ income and earnings estimates within the fourth quarter and predicted “notably lower” EV gross sales development this 12 months. The drop, which took $82 billion out of Tesla’s market cap, was the worst single-day efficiency for shares of Elon Musk’s EV large for the reason that 21% plunge seen in September 2020—and analysts have been fast to criticize administration.

Wedbush Securities’ Dan Ives, a famous Tesla bull, mentioned in a Thursday be aware that the corporate’s earnings name left Wall Avenue with “minimal answers and lots of questions and frustration yet again.”

Buyers have been in search of specifics relating to declining margins and the seemingly “never-ending” string of EV price cuts at Tesla, Ives mentioned, however as an alternative they received a “more cautious” Musk who was centered on the manufacturing of next-gen EVs in addition to full-self-driving and AI investments.

“We were dead wrong expecting Musk and team to step up like adults in the room on the call and give a strategic and financial overview of the ongoing price cuts, margin structure, and fluctuating demand,” Ives wrote. “Instead we got a high level Tesla long term view with another train wreck conference call.”

Shaky earnings

Tesla’s reported fourth-quarter income of $25.17 billion on Wednesday, effectively beneath Wall Avenue’s estimate for $25.64 billion, and a rise of simply 3% from a 12 months in the past. On the identical time, the corporate’s gross revenue margin, which has been buyers’ major focus in latest quarters amid repeated EV worth cuts, sank to 17.6%, from 23.8% in the identical interval a 12 months in the past. Tack on the outlook for “notably lower” EV sales growth in 2024 in comparison with 2023, and it was a “bitter pill to swallow” for Tesla’s stockholders, Ives mentioned.

On the decision, Tesla warned that it’s caught “between two major growth phases” because it develops next-gen EVs, full-self-driving tech, and AI and robotics choices. On that entrance, Musk mentioned that it was “quite likely” that Tesla’s $25,000 entry-level EV would launch as quickly as late 2025, however provided solely “relatively superficial comments” about his new humanoid robotic, Optimus, and full-self-driving beta testing, in keeping with Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas.

The long-term story

Regardless of the poor earnings report, Wedbush’s Ives maintained his buy-equivalent “outperform” score on Tesla shares. He did decrease his 12-month worth goal from $350 to $315, arguing that the potential for extra EV worth cuts and an absence of concrete margin and gross sales steerage quantity to a “category 4 storm” for the corporate. However general, he mentioned he believes the long-term development story at Tesla nonetheless stays intact and that mass-market adoption of full-self-driving expertise and EVs will ultimately increase the corporate’s earnings.

“Our near-term confidence in the story is shaken, but we remain firm on a long term bull thesis around Tesla and the broader AI story set to take hold. This is a pivotal period for Musk to get Tesla through that will help shape (or haunt) its EV future,” he wrote.

CFRA Analysis analyst Garret Nelson additionally stays bullish. Nelson reiterated his “buy” score for Tesla on Wednesday, arguing that the manufacturing of low-cost, mass-market EV in 2025 “could be the catalyst the stock needs.” 

“While the bottom-line miss was disappointing and uncharacteristic, as the low-cost U.S. EV producer and with prices appearing to be nearing an inflection point, we see significant earnings leverage for TSLA,” he wrote.

Then again, Tesla’s bears got here out firing this week. Gordon Johnson, founder and CEO of GLJ Analysis, argued in a Thursday note that Tesla’s fourth-quarter numbers present it’s only a “struggling car company,” and never the high-growth AI, robotics, and inexperienced vitality powerhouse that its supporters see.

Johnson maintained his “sell” score and $23.53 worth goal for Tesla, which represents 87% potential draw back, and argued Musk is nothing however “the world’s (most successful) sleazy used car salesman.”

Subscribe to the CFO Day by day e-newsletter to maintain up with the tendencies, points, and executives shaping company finance. Sign up at no cost.

SHARE THIS POST