Image

U.S. abstention on UN cease-fire vote triggers Netanyahu rage

US Ambassador to the United Nations Linda Thomas-Greenfield votes abstain throughout a vote on a decision calling for a right away ceasefire in Gaza throughout a United Nations Safety Council assembly on the scenario within the Center East, together with the Palestinian query, on the UN headquarters in New York on March 25, 2024.

Angela Weiss | Afp | Getty Photographs

The United Nations Safety Council on Monday adopted a decision demanding a right away ceasefire between Israel and Palestinian militant group Hamas, after the US abstained from the vote — prompting Israel to cancel the go to of a high-level delegation to Washington.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had warned previous to the vote that the delegation’s go to could be pulled, if Washington didn’t veto the movement. The U.S. abstention alerts a widening divide between the White Home and Israel’s present authorities, essentially the most right-wing in its historical past, almost six months into its conflict in opposition to Hamas within the Gaza Strip. Israel’s offensive into the Gaza enclave, which is available in response to the Oct. 7 Hamas terror assaults, has killed tens of hundreds of individuals.

“This is a clear retreat from the consistent position of the U.S. in the Security Council since the beginning of this war,” an announcement from Netanyahu’s workplace stated, including that “this withdrawal hurts both the war effort and the effort to release the abductees.”

The U.S. denied that the abstention marked a shift in its coverage. Some observers see it in a different way.

“It’s a breakthrough. An abstention from a UN Security Council permanent member is a yes vote, because it means they are not exercising their veto and basically agree with the text, even if they don’t want to say so,” Hussein Ibish, a senior resident scholar on the Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington, instructed CNBC.

“The U.S. declining to protect Israel from a resolution it passionately objects to by not providing a veto is an extraordinary thing.”

The Americans are 'rightly perplexed' at Netanyahu's reaction: Former Israeli foreign minister

The primary of its variety handed because the onset of the conflict, the decision referred to as for a right away cessation of hostilities between Israel and Palestinian militant group Hamas for 2 weeks, breaking a five-month deadlock throughout which the U.S. vetoed three U.N. requires a halt in combating. The movement additionally referred to as for the fast and unconditional launch of all hostages held by Hamas within the Gaza Strip.

State Division Spokesman Matthew Miller stated Washington’s causes to not approve the measure included its lack of condemnation for the Hamas terror assault, which led to roughly 1,200 deaths in Israel and took round 240 extra folks hostage.

However, Miller added, “the reason we didn’t veto it is because there were also things in that resolution that were consistent with our long term position, most importantly, that there should be a ceasefire and that there should be a release of hostages, which is what we understood also to be the government of Israel’s position. So it is a bit surprising and unfortunate that they are not going to apparently attend these meetings.”

SHARE THIS POST