With the 2024 presidential election just around the corner, crypto has gained significant momentum as a key issue in the race to the White House, especially with candidates Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump expressing support for the digital asset industry.

However, law experts assert that it is not the US President who will ultimately determine the future of digital assets in the United States, but Congress.

Focus On Congressional Action As The Key

A recent report by Dr Tonya Evans, a professor at Penn State Dickinson Law, highlights that Vice President Harris has moved away from President Biden’s previously antagonistic approach to cryptocurrencies, largely driven by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other regulators.

As reported by Bitcoinist, Harris now emphasizes a pro-innovation narrative, suggesting that blockchain and digital assets are crucial components of her vision for an “Opportunity Economy” to empower middle-class families and small businesses.

On the other hand, Trump has made headlines by promising to transform the US into the “crypto capital of the planet” and pledging to remove SEC Chair Gary Gensler from his position on his first day in office.

Despite these eye-catching promises, Evans believes that the President’s ability to enact meaningful change in the crypto landscape is limited.

Evans notes that the Congress, as the legislative branch of government, wields the real power to shape the regulatory framework governing digital assets. Under Article II of the Constitution, the President cannot unilaterally create laws or alter regulations.

Instead, the President’s role is primarily to enforce the laws that Congress passes and oversee regulatory agencies like the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

Evans further explains that Congress must take decisive legislative action for sustainable progress in the digital asset industry. Yet, she has noted that many observers and advocates for cryptocurrency often focus their attention on presidential races, neglecting Congress’s vital role in regulation.

Bipartisan Support For Crypto Grows In Congress

Despite what has been seen as a lack of congressional action in recent years, Evans is championing a notable advancement in the legislative landscape with the passage of the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT21), which incorporates Rep. Tom Emmer’s Securities Clarity Act.

This law aims to provide much-needed clarity in the digital asset space by distinguishing between an asset and the securities contract to which it may be linked, which would be key in potential future cases such as one of the most notorious between blockchain payments company Ripple and the SEC.

In addition, support for crypto innovation is gaining traction in Congress. Figures like Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA), once a critic of cryptocurrencies, now recognize the importance of engaging with emerging technologies.

At a recent town hall event, pro-crypto lawmakers urged Harris to adopt a more favorable stance toward digital assets. At the same time, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) expressed optimism about passing bipartisan legislation.

Moreover, the StandWithCrypto.com database indicates that over 50 Democratic lawmakers, including prominent figures like Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA), is now supportive of pro-crypto legislation.

To ensure that the US remains a leader in crypto adoption, Evans suggests that Congress must prioritize policies that foster innovation rather than merely tinkering with existing regulations.

Unlike the executive branch, the law professor said, Congress has the power to create tailored laws to meet the needs of the crypto industry. Evans concluded, “Now is the time to focus where the real power lies – on Congress.