WaPo Tries Pitting Donald In opposition to Melania, Fully Misses One Large Downside | The Gateway Pundit

The institution media have actually been scraping the underside of the barrel this election, of their determined seek for mud to fling at their arch-nemesis Donald Trump.

From the wailing and gnashing of tooth that ensued when Trump’s half-a-billion greenback bond was reduced to $175 million by the New York appellate court docket, to the pearl clutching over the willful misunderstanding of Trump’s “bloodbath” metaphor, the institution media sorts have been tying themselves in knots of their quest to smear Trump’s identify.

And now, The Washington Post has elevated its contribution to this embarrassing enterprise by attempting to fabricate some battle between Trump and his spouse, Melania.

The Submit started the try proper within the title, which alleged that “Trump’s mother-in-law came into the country by a process he derided.”

What precisely did The Submit imply by this headline?

Based mostly on an evaluation of immigration information launched on Monday, The Submit was in a position to observe the steps by which Trump’s mother-in-law, Amalija Knavs, who died in January on the age of 78, got here into the nation.

The Submit reported that Knavs was in a position to enter the nation and finally turn out to be a citizen due to the family-based means of immigration which, the Submit famous, Trump publicly spoke out in opposition to and sought to overtake throughout the course of his presidency.

That means, as The Submit defined, in accordance with United States legislation relationship again to 1965, residents can apply for his or her mother and father or minor youngsters to come back into the nation with out a prolonged visa ready interval.

In accordance with the lately launched information, Melania Trump did simply that for her mother and father in 1997, after which once more when her mother and father utilized for inexperienced playing cards in 2008. Authorized everlasting residency was granted on March 16, 2010. Knavs and her husband, Viktor, didn’t turned U.S. residents till Aug. 9, 2018.

Clearly, then, what The Submit tried to indicate was that, had Trump been president within the late 90’s or early 2000’s, then his in-laws may by no means have turn out to be residents and, due to this fact, Mr. and Mrs. Trump can’t be in concord with one another because of this.

What The Submit missed, nonetheless, was that Trump by no means had something in opposition to immigration in and of itself..

For one, if Trump and his spouse ever clashed over thse points, they presumably handled these points, and subsequently moved on from them, years in the past.

For an additional, what Trump objected to, as president and as a presidential candidate, had been the unlawful strategies of immigration, and the breakdown of a course of that when labored, however now has been abused by unhealthy actors to permit unacceptable ranges of chain migration.

Trump, through the RAISE Act, wished to restrict this household sponsorship to spouses and minor youngsters, eradicating mother and father from the quick observe of sponsorship and instating a system that may prioritize expert staff.

As The Federalist defined on the time, had this act handed, it will have reformed U.S. immigration to observe related programs that had been commonplace in international locations like Canada and Australia for years.

The purpose of the invoice was to not remove america’ immigration processes, however to reform them.

What The Submit failed to grasp was that Trump, and, certainly, conservatives basically, had been truly pro-immigration.

As an alternative, conservatives’ stance on immigration has been to prioritize these immigrants that may be materially good for america, and who would actively profit American society.

After all, respectable asylum requests didn’t fall beneath that stipulation, however general, that’s what differentiated the conservative place on immigration from that of the left.

These on the left have been actively advocating for permitting immigrants who’re actively dangerous to American society, because the tragic collection of murders and assaults of Americans has sadly demonstrated.

And that was what the Submit failed to grasp in its weak try to pit Trump and his spouse in opposition to one another.

Conservatives by no means hated immigration.

What Trump and conservatives hated was unlawful immigration.

This text appeared initially on The Western Journal.