Image

‘Bombshell’ witness testimony could result in Fani Willis’ disqualification from case: Civil rights atty

Civil rights lawyer Leo Terrell mentioned Thursday witness testimony could have supplied the important thing proof to disqualify District Lawyer Fani Willis and prosecutor Nathan Wade from Trump’s trial in Fulton County, Georgia.

Willis verbally sparred with lawyers for hours at an evidentiary listening to concerning her relationship with the lead prosecutor she employed to deliver the case in opposition to Trump. 

Co-defendant GOP political operative Michael Roman alleged in courtroom filings final month that Willis must be disqualified from the case, claiming that she financially benefited from hiring Wade due to their private relationship. 

Fox Information correspondent Steve Harrigan spoke to “Outnumbered” co-host Harris Faulkner about how the judge presiding over this case warned that “even the appearance” of a battle of curiosity or mendacity on affidavits could possibly be sufficient to disqualify each from involvement from Trump’s authorized case in Georgia.

Leo Terrell

Leo Terrell, a civil rights lawyer who serves as a FOX Information Media contributor, argued right this moment that the choose presiding over the Fani Willis case has stunning new proof he did not have 24 hours in the past. (Fox Information)

TRUMP PROSECUTOR FANI WILLIS’ WHITE HOUSE MEETINGS WARRANT ‘VERY DEEP INVESTIGATION,’ EX-PROSECUTOR SAYS

Terrell agreed when he joined the section, arguing the choose has key proof right this moment which will steer the course of the case.

“Well, I’ll tell you right now, the bombshell is the witness who testified that there was a personal relationship before the prosecution of this case, and that is the evidence that the judge will have to decide,” he mentioned. “Steve Harrigan said it best. Disqualification occurs if there is actual conflict or the appearance.”

Terrell went on to say, “I would submit to you that the witness who testified on the relationship prior to 2022 is the evidence of the appearance of a romantic relationship.”

The opposite notable courtroom occasion Terrell recalled was “Wade’s characterization that his marriage was over in 2015. He lost a lot of credibility, because the interlocutories that he answered deny the existence of any gift, dinners or anything else. That was a very creative argument on his part. I don’t think it’s gonna fly, because it doesn’t pass the smell test, those are the two facts that I think were significant today.”

Faulkner famous the witness certainly was shut sufficient to Willis to the purpose the place she may testify about her life, in that “not only did she work in the District Attorney’s office for Fani Willis, she also rented housing out to Fani Willis when Fani Willis didn’t want to live at home anymore. She was renting a condo from [the witness], so they had a close relationship, they were close friends, that is what she called them.”

Fani Willis testifying

Fulton County District Lawyer Fani Willis testifies throughout a listening to within the case of the State of Georgia v. Donald John Trump on the Fulton County Courthouse on February 15, 2024 in Atlanta, Georgia. Choose Scott McAfee is listening to testimony as as to whether Willis and Particular Prosecutor Nathan Wade must be disqualified from the case for allegedly mendacity a couple of private relationship. (Picture by Alyssa Pointer-Pool/Getty Photos)

FANI WILLIS, WHO ‘RELISHED IN’ DONALD TRUMP PROSECUTION, SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM CASE FOR ILLICIT AFFAIR: EXPERTS

Terrell was requested by co-host Kayleigh McEnany about whether or not progress was made in discerning the timing and monetary points of Willis and Wade’s relationship.

“Regarding the existence of a relationship prior to 2022, the answer is definitely yes, this friend of hers had personal knowledge,” Terrell mentioned. “She saw Fani Willis. She conversed with Fani Willis. Fani Willis told her that there was a romantic relationship, so definitely on that, yes, and again I go back to those interlocutories where Nathan Wade tried to conceal in his divorce proceedings, by way of interlocutories, the existence of gifts or dinners or trips.”

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

Terrell went on to summarize, “I think there is evidence that the judge has now that he didn’t have 24 hours ago. And again, I cannot stress this enough, disqualification occurs, Kayleigh, if there is actual conflict or the appearance. We learned a lot today, the nation learned a lot, so I think those two components have been met.”

Fox Information’s Brianna Herlihy contributed to this report.

SHARE THIS POST