Two stars and the director of the upcoming film “Civil War” threw chilly water on reporters’ assumptions that the fascist fictional U.S. president within the movie relies on or impressed by former President Trump.
The movie’s stars, actors Nick Offerman and Kristen Dunst, every denied that Trump and the real-world political divide had been the inspiration for the film’s fictional U.S. civil battle.
In keeping with director Alex Garland in an interview with The Hollywood Reporter, the movie’s U.S. president – performed by Offerman – shows fascistic tendencies and makes an attempt to strong-arm himself for a 3rd time period.
The president’s transfer sparks the movie’s central battle with an alliance between Texas and California searching for to problem the facility seize.
AMERICA ‘UNRECOGNIZABLE’ AND ON THE BRINK OF COLLAPSE, EXPERTS WARN: ‘TURNING ON OUR OWN LEGACY’
“Civil War” actors Nick Offerman and Kirsten Dunst each denied that the movie is impressed by actual world politics and former President Trump. (1. Aliah Anderson / Workers 2. Monica Schipper / Workers)
Reporters who spoke to each Offerman and Dunst in separate interviews requested if this fictional sequence was impressed by Trump, who many Hollywood liberals consider tried an actual fascist energy seize whereas disputing the outcomes of the 2020 election.
Throughout the movie’s SXSW Movie and TV Pageant premiere, the Hollywood Reporter requested Offerman, “There’s obvious comparisons to Trump here and our political climate. How closely did you want to play that?”
Nonetheless, the “Parks and Rec” actor threw cold water on the affiliation.
“Honestly, it didn’t even come up,” Offerman advised the reporter, including that the movie “is so unrelated to any actual factions or politicians. That’s what I think is so brilliant about this film. Everybody on any side of the aisle or any faction has a lot to say, and we’re all immediately divisive and partisan in our conversations.”
Additional dismissing actual world divisions, he mentioned, “Everybody’s mad about those other jerks, and this movie transcends that. It’s about all of us. And I’m so grateful for that.”
Later within the trade, he said, “It would be so easy to make this movie and lay in some Easter eggs and some of this or that, but you would lose half your audience this way or the other. Instead, this is like a great novel, it’s for everybody to say, ‘Oh, maybe heading toward war in our country is not the best route. Maybe we should reconsider the direction we’re heading.'”
MORE YOUNG AMERICANS DOOMSDAY PREPPING FOR 2024 ELECTION: SYSTEM ‘NOT AS STABLE AS WE ASSUMED’
Peter Corridor, Alex Garland, Kirsten Dunst, Cailee Spaeny and Wagner Moura on the premiere of “Civil War” as a part of SXSW 2024 Convention and Festivals held on the Paramount Theatre on March 14, 2024 in Austin, Texas. ((Photograph by Chris Saucedo/SXSW Convention & Festivals by way of Getty Photographs))
Throughout a latest interview with “Variety,” actress Kirsten Dunst, who performs a journalist within the movie, claimed she didn’t see the resemblance between Offerman’s president and Trump.
Selection wrote, “But it’s impossible to watch ‘Civil War’ without being reminded of this year’s presidential election — you know, the one where democracy and maybe the fate of the free world hangs in the balance?”
It appeared to recommend that Dunst was reluctant to see the parallels between Trump and the movie’s character, stating, “Dunst won’t admit that the film’s president, played by Nick Offerman as a narcissist with an authoritarian streak, resembles the 45th, and perhaps 47th, Oval Office occupant.”
“It feels fictitious to me,” she mentioned about Offerman’s portrayal. “I don’t want to compare because that’s the antithesis of the film. It’s just a fascist president. But I didn’t think about Nick’s character being any certain political figure. I just thought this is this president, in this world, who will not abide by the Constitution and democracy.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
In her interview with The Hollywood Reporter at SXSW, Dunst additionally maintained the film isn’t meant to ship a political message or present commentary. “It’s a movie, and it’s meant to start conversations and I think it really lets the audience decide what they want to put onto it,” she mentioned, including, “It’s not partisan in any way, I think it’s actually more of an anti-war film if anything.”
