Image

DOJ official roasted after claiming ignorance of Biden admin being on trial for violating First Modification

A civil rights official on the Department of Justice, Kristen Clarke, was sharply criticized by congressional lawmakers after claiming she was not conversant in a landmark case about freedom of speech.

The Supreme Courtroom agreed in October to assessment a court-ordered ban on sure communications between the Biden administration and Massive Tech platforms after state attorneys normal from Missouri and Louisiana accused high-ranking authorities officers of working with social media firms “under the guise of combating misinformation.” They argued this in the end led to censoring speech on subjects that included Hunter Biden’s laptop computer, COVID-19 origins and the efficacy of face masks.

Missouri Lawyer Common Andrew Bailey stated the excessive courtroom’s assessment may sign the justices “acknowledge that these are the worst First Amendment violations on this nation’s historical past and that this difficulty needs to be addressed, and it needs to be addressed by the best courtroom within the land.”

A confrontation occurred at a Tuesday Home Judiciary Subcommittee on the Structure and Restricted Authorities listening to as Clarke claimed ignorance relating to a serious case about private liberty in the USA.

Rep Bishop and Assistant AG Clarke

Rep. Dan Bishop questioned Assistant AG for Civil Rights on the DOJ, Kristen Clark, for claiming she was unfamiliar with what could also be a landmark free speech case.

SENATOR MOVES TO PROTECT AMERICANS’ FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS FROM BIDEN ADMIN COLLUSION WITH BIG TECH

Rep. Dan Bishop, R-N.C. recalled the “Missouri vs. Biden case” has been speculated by the district courtroom to presumably examine the “most massive attack on free speech in United States history and how the Supreme Court has since taken jurisdiction of the case.” 

Bishop then requested her straight, “Is any criminal investigation or prosecution of the persons responsible for that activity in the FBI, CISA, and at the White House and their co-conspirators underway in the Civil Rights Division?”

“Congressman, I’m not familiar with this litigation, but happy to bring your question back,” Clarke replied.

 “You are not aware of the Missouri vs. Biden litigation that is currently being taken up by the United States Supreme Court. Is that correct?” Bishop requested.

“Unfortunately, I’m not, Congressman,” Clarke answered.

Kristen Clarke

DOJ Workplace of Civil Rights Assistant Lawyer Common Kristen Clarke.  ((Picture by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Photos))

BIDEN AGENCY ‘LIKELY’ VIOLATED FREE SPEECH BY WORKING WITH BIG TECH TO CENSOR ELECTION CONTENT: COURT

Bishop pivoted and argued that if what she stated was true, then it places the priorities of her division in query.

“Assuming that you’re not aware of that, what reason would there be that the civil rights division of the Justice Department leader is unaware of what a United States District Court has described as the most massive attack on free speech in the United States history?” he requested.

After suggesting it might be “helpful” if the lawmaker may “share more of the facts,” Clarke later claimed that “this does not appear to be a case that I’m familiar with.”

Footage of the trade went viral across social media as public figures slammed the official for claiming to not concentrate on a case in regards to the very rights her division ought to be defending in concept.

“The Assistant AG for Civil Rights at the DOJ has ZERO awareness of the Missouri v. Biden case, which is set to be heard by SCOTUS,” Bishop wrote. “A US District Court called the Biden admin’s actions in the case ‘the most massive attack against free speech in United States’ history.’ Wow.”

In a following put up to X, previously often called Twitter, he wrote, “How could it be possible that the Assistant AG has zero awareness of such a consequential case for Americans’ #1a rights?” alongside a pondering emoji.

On one other account, Bishop added that the video explains one’s questions, “If you wonder why it falls to state attorneys general to protect fundamental individual rights under the US Constitution.”

“Missouri v. Biden exposed the vast censorship enterprise between big tech and the government to censor American voices,” Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., wrote. “The fact that the Assistant AG for Civil Rights at the DOJ has no idea about it is insane.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Writer and commentator Michael Shellenberger, who has spoken and testified in regards to the authorities cracking down on free speech, additionally wrote, “This is insane.”

Brianna Herlihy contributed to this report.

SHARE THIS POST