Image

Harvard Jewish group blasts Ivy League president for ‘disappointing’ testimony on antisemitism

After Harvard President Claudine Gay wouldn’t say that the requires the genocide of Jews was a breach of the Ivy League college’s code of conduct, the native campus Jewish group referred to as on the president to “take action” to guard Jewish college students.

When responding to Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-NY, questions on Harvard’s guidelines for bullying and harassment, President Homosexual mentioned that speech that qualifies as harassment “depends on the context.”

The Jewish pupil group, Harvard Hillel, mentioned that President Homosexual’s “refusal” to “draw a line” on threatening antisemitic speech is “profoundly shocking.”

“President Gay’s refusal to draw a line around threatening antisemitic speech as a violation of Harvard’s policies is profoundly shocking given explicit provisions within the conduct code prohibiting this kind of bullying and harassment,” the Harvard Hillel mentioned in a press release posted on social media.

STEFANIK GRILLS HARVARD PRESIDENT OVER STUDENTS CALLING FOR ‘INTIFADA,’ RAMPANT ANTISEMITISM ON CAMPUS

Claudine Gay

Dr. Claudine Homosexual, President of Harvard College, testifies earlier than the Home Training and Workforce Committee on the Rayburn Home Workplace Constructing on December 05, 2023 in Washington, DC.  (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Photos)

The group mentioned that they’re appalled by the president’s lack of motion and questioned the president’s “ability to protect Jewish students on Harvard’s campus.”

“We are appalled by the need to state the obvious: A call for genocide against Jews is always a hateful incitement of violence. President Gay’s failure to properly condemn this speech calls into question her ability to protect Jewish students on Harvard’s campus,” the Harvard Hillel mentioned. “Chants to “globalize the intifada,” an endorsement of violent terrorist attacks against Jewish and Israeli civilians, and “from the river to the ocean,” an eliminationist slogan intended to deprive Jews of their right to self-determination in Israel, have become tragically routine at Harvard.”

Supporters of Palestinians at Harvard University

Supporters of Palestinians collect at Harvard College to indicate their assist for Palestinians in Gaza at a rally in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on October 14, 2023. (Picture by JOSEPH PREZIOSO/AFP through Getty Photos)

“President Gay’s testimony fails to reassure us that the University is seriously concerned about the antisemitic rhetoric pervasive on campus. We call on President Gay to take action against those using threatening speech that violates our community standards,” the Harvard Hillel mentioned.

HARVARD, MIT AND UPENN PRESIDENTS PRESSED ON ‘RACE-BASED IDEOLOGY OF THE RADICAL LEFT’ AT ANTISEMITISM HEARING

Harvard Hillel President Jacob Miller mentioned that the president’s testimony was “utterly disappointing,” and that tackling antisemitism will take “head-on resolve” not “weak equivocation.”

HARVARD WHISTLEBLOWER POINTS TO ‘UNDISGUISED CALLS FOR THE MURDER OF JEWS’ AFTER LAUNCH OF FEDERAL PROBE

“President Gay’s testimony today was stunning and utterly disappointing,” Miller wrote in an X publish.  “Tackling campus antisemitism will take head-on resolve, not the weak equivocation that was on display today.”

Harvard president testifies

Lawmakers on the schooling committee will grill the leaders of Harvard College, the College of Pennsylvania and the Massachusetts Institute of Expertise about their responses to protests that erupted after the October 7 assault on Israel by Hamas.  (Haiyun Jiang/Bloomberg through Getty Photos)

Homosexual, who testified in Congress on Tuesday, December 5 alongside MIT President Sally Kornbluth and College of Pennsylvania President Elizabeth Magill, beforehand denounced Hamas’ terrorist assault in opposition to Israel on October 7.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

Following criticism from pro-Palestinian student groups, Homosexual launched a video message two days later saying that although the college doesn’t “punish or sanction” individuals for expressing polarizing views, it doesn’t imply that it endorses them.

SHARE THIS POST