The Federalist editor-in-chief and FOX Information contributor Mollie Hemingway joined “The Ingraham Angle” to talk about the lawsuit her information website and others filed in opposition to the State Division, alleging the Biden administration violated its First Modification rights.
“We filed a lawsuit against the State Department for their illegal and unconstitutional violation of our free speech rights, of our First Amendment rights. And we did it with The Daily Wire, with the state of Texas, with the New Civil Liberties Alliance,” Hemingway informed FOX Information’ Laura Ingraham Wednesday. “And what the suit shows is that the State Department was engaged in setting up, funding, marketing, promoting and continuing to work with these private companies that are engaged in censorship of speech. They privilege left-wing media outlets like The New York Times and The Washington Post, they helped advertisers meet those people, and they unconstitutionally go after -“
“[They] purposefully sought to deprive you of your civil rights,” Ingraham mentioned.
“Yes,” Hemingway responded. “And those media outlets that actually debunk some of the fake news that’s coming from the left, whether it’s the Russia collusion scam or the Kavanaugh smear or COVID hysteria, they’re trying to shut them down, and we say it’s enough. They should not be able to participate using our tax dollars and the power of the federal government.”
BIDEN STATE DEPARTMENT BLACKLISTS CONSERVATIVE NEWS OUTLETS, LAWSUIT CLAIMS: ‘CENSORSHIP REGIME’
Fox Information contributor Mollie Hemingway appeared on “The Ingraham Angle” to debate The Federalist’s lawsuit in opposition to the State Division. (Fox Information Channel)
Within the go well with filed Wednesday within the U.S. District Court docket in Texas, the State Division is accused of “funding and promotion of censorship applied sciences and personal censorship enterprises that blacklist” conservative information websites The Federalist and The Day by day Wire, which negatively impacts the platforms’ “ability to circulate and distribute their publications to both current and potential audiences.”
The lawsuit claims that the State Department applied sciences are “intentionally destroying” the conservative websites’ capacity to acquire advertisers.
“Defendants have been granted no statutory authority to fund or promote censorship technology or censorship enterprises that target the American press, tarring disfavored domestic news organizations as purveyors of ‘disinformation,’” the lawsuit states.
GOP LAWMAKER PROBES ALLEGED STATE DEPT FUNDING OF UK’S ‘GLOBAL DISINFORMATION INDEX’
“There is no enumerated general power to censor speech or the press found in the United States Constitution, and the First Amendment expressly forbids it, providing: ‘Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech or of the press,’” it continues.
“The State Department’s use of tax dollars to fund the silencing of a segment of the American press is appalling—and terrifying. A free and open press is foundational to our constitutional Republic, which is precisely why the Bill of Rights guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of the press in the First Amendment,” Margot Cleveland, counsel at NCLA, mentioned in an announcement.
The outside of the State Division complicated is seen on March 14, 2023 in Washington, DC. (Photograph by Nathan Posner/Anadolu Company through Getty Photographs) (Nathan Posner/Anadolu Company through Getty Photographs)
In response to the lawsuit, the State Division makes use of its World Engagement Heart (GEC) to finance the event and promotion of censorship know-how and enterprises, together with NewsGuard and the World Disinformation Index.
“These entities generate blacklists of ostensibly risky or unreliable American news outlets for the purpose of discrediting and demonetizing the disfavored press and redirecting money and audiences to news organizations that publish favored viewpoints,” the lawsuit states.
Mark Chenoweth, president and basic counsel at NCLA mentioned, “The federal government cannot do indirectly what the First Amendment forbids it from doing directly. The chilling censorship machinations alleged in this complaint will frighten all liberty-loving Americans to the core.”
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken holds a press convention after attending a session of the Group of seven International Ministers conferences in Tokyo on Wednesday, Nov. 8. (Jonathan Ernst/Pool Photograph through AP))
The GEC’s acknowledged mission is to “direct, lead, synchronize, integrate, and coordinate U.S. Federal Government efforts to recognize, understand, expose, and counter foreign state and non-state propaganda and disinformation efforts aimed at undermining or influencing the policies, security, or stability of the United States, its allies, and partner nations.”
The lawsuit notes that while Congress dramatically expanded the breadth of GEC’s mission, its goal remained restricted to combating “foreign” disinformation.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“Congress explicitly included a limitation in the spending bills that provided: ‘None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made available to carry out this section shall be used for purposes other than countering foreign propaganda and misinformation that threatens United States national security.’”
“While Congress forbade GEC from using funds appropriated or otherwise made available to it to counter Americans’ speech… many of GEC’s activities and initiatives targeted speech spoken in America among Americans, including Media Plaintiffs’ speech and press rights,” the lawsuit says.
The State Division didn’t reply to FOX Information’ request for remark.
Fox Information’ Brianna Herlihy contributed to this report.
